discuss: Android?


Previous by date: 11 Feb 2016 04:46:43 +0000 Re: LDP needed tasks, doark.mail.com
Next by date: 11 Feb 2016 04:46:43 +0000 Re: Linuxdoc vs Docbook. Was:Re: LAG changes, multiple formats; DocBook 5.0 was [ My rejected "replacement" for the Author Guide, Binh Nguyen
Previous in thread: 11 Feb 2016 04:46:43 +0000 Re: Android?, Martin A. Brown
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: Android?
From: David Niklas ####@####.####
Date: 11 Feb 2016 04:46:43 +0000
Message-Id: <20160210215954.201df9bc@ulgy_thing>

On Fri, 5 Feb 2016 09:22:52 ####@####.#### wrote:
> 
> Hello again David,
> 
> >> > If the TLDP is revived, perhaps it (we?) should consider somehow
> >> > supporting documentation for Android as well.  IIUC, Android uses
> >> > the (or a) Linux kernel or a derivative thereof.
> >
> >Do we really want to support google?
> >Shouldn't they be doing it?
> >Perhaps we should write docs especially for redhat?
> 
> Well, we do have HOWTOs that are RedHat-specific, Compaq-specific, 
> and several describing Linux interoperability with commercial 
> software (Sybase, Windows of various types, and specific vendor 
> hardware).
> 
<snip>
Good points, I agree.
I just feel sorry for the people who I have to tell that "Android is
linux."

Sincerely, David

Previous by date: 11 Feb 2016 04:46:43 +0000 Re: LDP needed tasks, doark.mail.com
Next by date: 11 Feb 2016 04:46:43 +0000 Re: Linuxdoc vs Docbook. Was:Re: LAG changes, multiple formats; DocBook 5.0 was [ My rejected "replacement" for the Author Guide, Binh Nguyen
Previous in thread: 11 Feb 2016 04:46:43 +0000 Re: Android?, Martin A. Brown
Next in thread:


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.