discuss: [info] migration preparation; more output and source cleanup
Subject:
Re: [info] migration preparation; more output and source cleanup
From:
"Martin A. Brown" ####@####.####
Date:
9 Feb 2016 16:00:59 +0000
Message-Id: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1602090800050.2025@znpeba.jbaqresebt.arg>
>> Working on the cleanup of the output tree has also caused me to
>> retired. I therefore created a new directory called
>> LDP/LDP/retired/ which now contains any documents which should no
>> longer be published. I'm operating under the assumption that the
>> documents in the output tree represent the canonical set.
>Good. They will only be published on the master site and not the
>mirrors. A major use of "retired" will be for historical purposes.
>But even current docs may want to mention history. And a few might
>serve as examples we shouldn't have accepted in the first place.
OK. We'll have a 'retired' section in the output tree (visible on
the web). I only created the 'retired' section of the source tree,
but it's fine and easy. The 'retired' documents will not be
automatically updated.
>I recall that some documents that had many errors were removed for
>review. Maybe there should have a "rejected" documents subtree.
>One doc removed for review was mostly plagiarized from the Inet but
>not marked as such.
If we reject a document, why would we want to publish it under
tldp.org? I am not crazy about this idea.
Or do you mean that we should have a place in the source tree where
we store the 'rejected' documents?
-Martin
--
Martin A. Brown
http://linux-ip.net/
