discuss: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas


Previous by date: 24 Dec 2012 17:18:42 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, Roger
Next by date: 24 Dec 2012 17:18:42 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, Roger
Previous in thread: 24 Dec 2012 17:18:42 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, Roger
Next in thread: 24 Dec 2012 17:18:42 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, Roger

Subject: Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas
From: Paul Hendricksen ####@####.####
Date: 24 Dec 2012 17:18:42 +0000
Message-Id: <-4118438953126083922@unknownmsgid>

Over a year ago I suggested this idea and was shot down. I have missed
a lot of this conversation, what has changed?

V/R,

Paul Hendricksen

On Dec 24, 2012, at 9:05 AM, Roger ####@####.#### wrote:

> Wiki format is best.
>
>> I was also reading through the discussion list, and picked up an important
>> point:
>> -The wiki is a "beta holding ground", for guides that were incomplete not
>> not ready to be published.
>
> True, but most Wiki's have an embedded publish button, allowing the viewer to
> print to a printer or export to PDF/PS or EPUB, or other desired format.
>
> After awhile of editing, corrections and formatting corrections, the documents
> are usually better and more up-to-date then anything published in the past.
>
> Else, you end-up with something like TLDP, where the documentation is full of
> errors and out-dated.  Caused by being next to impossible to submit corrections
> by the average viewer.  Like somebody experienced is going to take the time to
> meticulously reread the documentation like an initial reader does.
>
> Initially, didn't think worth while to respond as I just assumed people would
> already understand this.
>
> If TLDP wants a finished product, have a script to automatically take snapshots
> of the Wiki pages, publishing to PS/PDF/HTML as they do now.
>
> I don't think there's much argument as to what's best, just think energy for
> documentation is more focused at the Distro level, in an effort to gain
> advertisement and interest for their Distro.  The flip-side being, duplicated
> and replicated documentation efforts.
>
> The majority of duplicated efforts, should probably be candidates for merging
> into TLDP, along with it's already acquired documentation.
>
> Think Wiki and TLDP's lack of interest in Wiki is the primary move to
> documentation at the Distro level.
>
> ... just some thoughts.
>
>
> --
> Roger
> http://rogerx.freeshell.org/
>
> ______________________
> http://lists.tldp.org/
>

Previous by date: 24 Dec 2012 17:18:42 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, Roger
Next by date: 24 Dec 2012 17:18:42 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, Roger
Previous in thread: 24 Dec 2012 17:18:42 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, Roger
Next in thread: 24 Dec 2012 17:18:42 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, Roger


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.