discuss: [dave@lafn.org: Re: New Contributer]


Previous by date: 11 May 2012 12:20:46 +0100 Re: New Contributer, jdd
Next by date: 11 May 2012 12:20:46 +0100 Re: [discuss] Re: Request for comments and recommendations, jdd
Previous in thread: 11 May 2012 12:20:46 +0100 [dave@lafn.org: Re: New Contributer], David Lawyer
Next in thread: 11 May 2012 12:20:46 +0100 Re: [dave@lafn.org: Re: New Contributer], jdd

Subject: Re: [dave@lafn.org: Re: New Contributer]
From: Martin Wheeler ####@####.####
Date: 11 May 2012 12:20:46 +0100
Message-Id: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1205110648440.10592@chaucer.startext.demon.co.uk>

On Thu, 10 May 2012, David Lawyer wrote:

> In my option linuxdoc is preferred, next comes wiki text, and docbook
> is least preferred.

And in *my* option, cuneiform on clay tablets is preferred above all
else....

Linuxdoc is dead.
In this field, markup specialists use docbook; everyone else uses
spray-cans on internet walls.

Can we now please get over it ?

[PS - the correct English spelling is : "contributOr".
Just thought someone on the list might like to know.]
-- 
Martin Wheeler
http://martinwheeler.net/journal

Previous by date: 11 May 2012 12:20:46 +0100 Re: New Contributer, jdd
Next by date: 11 May 2012 12:20:46 +0100 Re: [discuss] Re: Request for comments and recommendations, jdd
Previous in thread: 11 May 2012 12:20:46 +0100 [dave@lafn.org: Re: New Contributer], David Lawyer
Next in thread: 11 May 2012 12:20:46 +0100 Re: [dave@lafn.org: Re: New Contributer], jdd


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.