discuss: [dave@lafn.org: Re: New Contributer]


Previous by date: 11 May 2012 04:35:51 +0100 Re: New Contributer, Roger
Next by date: 11 May 2012 04:35:51 +0100 Re: New Contributer, jdd
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 11 May 2012 04:35:51 +0100 Re: [dave@lafn.org: Re: New Contributer], Martin Wheeler

Subject: [dave@lafn.org: Re: New Contributer]
From: David Lawyer ####@####.####
Date: 11 May 2012 04:35:51 +0100
Message-Id: <20120511040103.GA1251@davespc>

			David Lawyer

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 05:52:17PM +0100, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Wesley Werner ####@####.#### wrote:
> > On May 9, 2012 7:25 PM, "Roger" wrote:
> >> However, commandline junkies enjoy tldp from what I see.
> >
> > Myself included. So I take it text or docbook is the preferred format?
> 
> docbook is preferred :-)
In my option linuxdoc is preferred, next comes wiki text, and docbook
is least preferred. :-)  Well, if the wiki text could be converted both
ways to linuxdoc/docbook, then wiki text would be preferred.  The
preference of linuxdoc would disappear if docbook could be revised so
that linuxdoc was a subset of docbook.

			David Lawyer
> 
> cheers,
> serge
> 
> ______________________
> http://lists.tldp.org/
> 
> 

Previous by date: 11 May 2012 04:35:51 +0100 Re: New Contributer, Roger
Next by date: 11 May 2012 04:35:51 +0100 Re: New Contributer, jdd
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 11 May 2012 04:35:51 +0100 Re: [dave@lafn.org: Re: New Contributer], Martin Wheeler


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.