discuss: subversion


Previous by date: 29 Apr 2004 16:08:45 -0000 Re: subversion, Sergiusz Pawlowicz
Next by date: 29 Apr 2004 16:08:45 -0000 Re: license issues, doug jensen
Previous in thread: 29 Apr 2004 16:08:45 -0000 Re: subversion, Sergiusz Pawlowicz
Next in thread: 29 Apr 2004 16:08:45 -0000 Re: subversion, Gerardo Arnaez

Subject: Re: subversion
From: Emma Jane Hogbin ####@####.####
Date: 29 Apr 2004 16:08:45 -0000
Message-Id: <20040429160605.GD1124@smeagol>

On Thu, Apr 29, 2004 at 05:57:03PM +0200, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote:
> --->[Quoting Bob Matlin ####@####.####
> > So far, the  people I'm working with have  had no problems
> > with subversion  and are  quite happy  with it.  We've all
> > used cvs in the past and found the transition easy.
> 
> i  still have  no idea  why change  things which  work well.
> moving files and directories on our cvs is not frequent, and
> could be easily done on server side.
> we need people to work on documentation.

100%, absolutely agreed. I couldn't have said it better myself, Ser!

emma

-- 
Emma Jane Hogbin
[[ 416 417 2868 ][ www.xtrinsic.com ]]

Previous by date: 29 Apr 2004 16:08:45 -0000 Re: subversion, Sergiusz Pawlowicz
Next by date: 29 Apr 2004 16:08:45 -0000 Re: license issues, doug jensen
Previous in thread: 29 Apr 2004 16:08:45 -0000 Re: subversion, Sergiusz Pawlowicz
Next in thread: 29 Apr 2004 16:08:45 -0000 Re: subversion, Gerardo Arnaez


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.