discuss: subversion


Previous by date: 29 Apr 2004 18:55:58 -0000 Re: license issues, Rahul Sundaram
Next by date: 29 Apr 2004 18:55:58 -0000 Re: subversion, Rahul Sundaram
Previous in thread: 29 Apr 2004 18:55:58 -0000 Re: subversion, Emma Jane Hogbin
Next in thread: 29 Apr 2004 18:55:58 -0000 Re: subversion, Rahul Sundaram

Subject: Re: subversion
From: Gerardo Arnaez ####@####.####
Date: 29 Apr 2004 18:55:58 -0000
Message-Id: <20040429185557.23192.qmail@web20207.mail.yahoo.com>

--- Sergiusz Pawlowicz ####@####.#### wrote:

> i  still have  no idea  why change  things which 
> work well.
> moving files and directories on our cvs is not
> frequent, and
> could be easily done on server side.

1. True. I said I was jsut curious. I have read (has
not happened) that CVS can lose data since it is not
atomic, which svn is, which is the big plus and the
reason why I switched.


> 
> we need people to work on documentation.
> 

2. True. I was just curious about people's opinions

> 
> Sergiusz
> -- 
> private: http://ibiblio.org/ser/ | company:
> http://a-k-f.com
> jabber:  ####@####.####          | mobile:  +48  502
>  660860
> 
> ______________________
> http://lists.tldp.org/
> 



	
		
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs  
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover 

Previous by date: 29 Apr 2004 18:55:58 -0000 Re: license issues, Rahul Sundaram
Next by date: 29 Apr 2004 18:55:58 -0000 Re: subversion, Rahul Sundaram
Previous in thread: 29 Apr 2004 18:55:58 -0000 Re: subversion, Emma Jane Hogbin
Next in thread: 29 Apr 2004 18:55:58 -0000 Re: subversion, Rahul Sundaram


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.