st-pti: Re: provider, ale outsourcing?


Previous by date: 6 Apr 2012 21:45:46 +0100 Re: provider, ale outsourcing?, adydlapti
Next by date: 6 Apr 2012 21:45:46 +0100 Re: provider, ale outsourcing?, Grzes Plucinski
Previous in thread: 6 Apr 2012 21:45:46 +0100 Re: provider, ale outsourcing?, adydlapti
Next in thread: 6 Apr 2012 21:45:46 +0100 Re: provider, ale outsourcing?, Grzes Plucinski

Subject: RE: [st-pti] provider, ale outsourcing?
From: Dorożyński ####@####.####
Date: 6 Apr 2012 21:45:46 +0100
Message-Id: <01c701cd1436$37646bd0$a62d4370$@wampnm.webd.pl>

| -----Original Message-----
| From: adydlapti ####@####.####
| Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2012 8:55 PM
/
| Ale outsourcing to już się chyba zakorzenił? Słyszałem nawet czasownik
| ałtsorsować (outsource'ować ?)

To jest pikuś. Ja słyszałem o ałtsorsingu zewnętrznym. 

Osobiście - choć już słyszę, że za dłuuuugie - staram się używać określenia "obsługa zewnętrzna", a na SLA GPO/GPU ( :-) ), oraz na ITIL - BITI.

	Pozdrowienia, Janusz Dorożyński 



Previous by date: 6 Apr 2012 21:45:46 +0100 Re: provider, ale outsourcing?, adydlapti
Next by date: 6 Apr 2012 21:45:46 +0100 Re: provider, ale outsourcing?, Grzes Plucinski
Previous in thread: 6 Apr 2012 21:45:46 +0100 Re: provider, ale outsourcing?, adydlapti
Next in thread: 6 Apr 2012 21:45:46 +0100 Re: provider, ale outsourcing?, Grzes Plucinski


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.