[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Revhistory
From: Tabatha Marshall ####@####.#### Date: 14 Nov 2003 09:20:50 -0000 Message-Id: <1068801618.20522.117.camel@mysticchild> Hi all, Just one more quick note before I stop thinking about LDP stuff for the night. Whenever changes are made to a document, we always add a revision entry. If you take a look at the source file, you'll see the revision history right above the document abstract (summary). A new document is usually given Version 1.0 - "Initial release - Reviewed by LDP" with the reviewer's or author's initials. Any previous revisions should be below 1.0 (if there are many, ask the author if it's okay to condense them into one, or put in its own section in the document as a history). When the files committed into CVS, the version numbers are tracked. If you're unsure what I mean, please ask for more details. For existing work, there should always be a version update and brief comments added about what was done on review, along with the reviewer's initials. If you take a look at any of the HOWTO source files, just follow suit with the existing revision entries to create one, or you can send it to me and I'll do it before it's resubmitted, if you like. I just had an urge to say that out loud! Thanks, Tab -- Tabatha Marshall Web: www.merlinmonroe.com Linux Documentation Project Review Coordinator (http://www.tldp.org) Linux Counter Area Manager US:wa (http://counter.li.org) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |