editors: Guide XML versus DocBook XML.


Previous by date: 18 Jul 2005 18:34:38 -0000 Re: what needs edited?, Machtelt Garrels
Next by date: 18 Jul 2005 18:34:38 -0000 Re: Review process, Machtelt Garrels
Previous in thread: 18 Jul 2005 18:34:38 -0000 Guide XML versus DocBook XML., folajimi
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: Guide XML versus DocBook XML.
From: Machtelt Garrels ####@####.####
Date: 18 Jul 2005 18:34:38 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0507181835460.3931-100000@cobra.xalasys.com>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Mon, 18 Jul 2005, folajimi wrote:

> All,
>
> While I am familiar with Guide XML, I understand that the LDP uses DocBook XML
> for the documentation efforts. Will my work be accepted if I use Guide XML?

I'm quite sure that we will either be able to do a conversion easily, or
that it would be easy for somebody who knows some form of XML to learn
DocBook.  Do you plan on submitting something or have you already
submitted something in Guide XML?

Tille.

- --
My Penguin, my freedom.		http://tille.xalasys.com
Books:				http://writers.fultus.com/garrels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFC2/bnsIIUbMXbBA8RAsIvAJ4i+dM42eJccy+3GCP+tXvHtCj30wCfXfBj
v6/0CBH9P2GOvEkFu9D9Cao=
=j2/C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Previous by date: 18 Jul 2005 18:34:38 -0000 Re: what needs edited?, Machtelt Garrels
Next by date: 18 Jul 2005 18:34:38 -0000 Re: Review process, Machtelt Garrels
Previous in thread: 18 Jul 2005 18:34:38 -0000 Guide XML versus DocBook XML., folajimi
Next in thread:


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.