docbook: Correct configuration for creating LDP acceptable documents
Subject:
Re: Correct configuration for creating LDP acceptable documents
From:
Greg Ferguson ####@####.####
Date:
18 Jul 2003 14:38:28 -0000
Message-Id: <200307181435.h6IEZ8jD117728@hoop.timonium.sgi.com>
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 10:21:55 -0400 Emma Jane Hogbin ####@####.#### wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 10:56:10AM +0200, Alasdair Hatfield wrote:
> > Am I right in thinking that to best move towards 'LDP compliant
> > documentation' we should be using the XML DTD 4.2 ?
>
> Yes. :)
We're encouraging XML, yes. It's not however a requirement.
The LDP supports:
Linuxdoc SGML; DocBook SGML v4.2, v4.1 or v3.x; and DocBook XML v4.2 or
v4.1.2
> > There are a selection of templates from the authors resources
> ...
> I'm not sure if this is the one that you think is generic, but this is
> the XML template:
> http://tldp.org/authors/template/Sample-HOWTO.xml
that's the correct LDP template.
> > other format) all is well and the text is black. If I render from
> > an ldp template (eg one calling the linuxdoc dsssl) then all the text is red.
Might be that it doesn't recognize/find the dtd.
