docbook: empty/strange toc entries
Subject:
Re: empty/strange toc entries
From:
"Greg Ferguson" ####@####.####
Date:
26 Jan 2001 14:34:14 -0000
Message-Id: <10101260929.ZM1126@hoop.timonium.sgi.com>
On Jan 26, 9:27am, Dan York wrote:
> Subject: Re: empty/strange toc entries
> Ferg,
>
> > For those following the discussion about the XML-RPC-HOWTO,
> > we found a strange/empty table of contents entry following
> > processing, such as (denoted by ">>"):
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but hasn't this been fixed in Norman Walsh's
> 1.60 or 1.61 stylesheets? It was a problem with 1.59... and I
> contacted him about it - he provided a fix (which I can't find exactly
> where it was) and said he'd correct it in his next release.
>
> So this *should* be fixed in the standard stylesheets if I am not
> mistaken. (Unless this is a *second* case of extra TOC entries)
It wasn't fixed with 1.60, which were the last officially released
set and are what we are now using for the LDP. 1.61 (last time I
checked) was still an "experimental release", as Norm indicated
on his site. Jorge says that the problem is fixed in 1.61.
I'll integrate those once they officially change to "released"
status (not experimental).
thanks,
--
Greg Ferguson - s/w engr / mtlhd | gferg at sgi.com
SGI Tech Pubs - http://techpubs.sgi.com/ |
Linux Doc Project - http://www.linuxdoc.org/ | gferg at metalab.unc.edu
