[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Should GFDL-1.3 be in LDP's accepted license list? was [New document:
Linux and Android HOWT]
From: "Martin A. Brown" ####@####.#### Date: 6 Mar 2016 01:23:25 +0000 Message-Id: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1603051718330.19013@znpeba.jbaqresebt.arg> Hello all, Guido has supplied an updated Linux-Android-HOWTO.sgml document. He has also clarified that his chosen license is, indeed, GFDL-1.3. Should the GFDL-1.3 be in our accepted list? > * This document refers to an unversioned GFDL (by link [0]). The > current version at that link is GFDL-1.3. It is not in the list > of currently-accepted TLDP licenses [1]. Should it be? > > * Does anybody know somebody with some Android expertise who can > provide a technical review of the content? I noticed that, at least, jdd reported some knowledge/awareness of Android. If anybody elso would like to review the document, please holler. And, also, I will perform a language (and markup) review once an appropriate technical reviewer has had a crack at the document. Best regards, -Martin -- Martin A. Brown http://linux-ip.net/ | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |