discuss: Thread: [dave@lafn.org: Re: New Contributer]

			David Lawyer

On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 05:52:17PM +0100, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 5:49 PM, Wesley Werner ####@####.#### wrote:
> > On May 9, 2012 7:25 PM, "Roger" wrote:
> >> However, commandline junkies enjoy tldp from what I see.
> >
> > Myself included. So I take it text or docbook is the preferred format?
> 
> docbook is preferred :-)
In my option linuxdoc is preferred, next comes wiki text, and docbook
is least preferred. :-)  Well, if the wiki text could be converted both
ways to linuxdoc/docbook, then wiki text would be preferred.  The
preference of linuxdoc would disappear if docbook could be revised so
that linuxdoc was a subset of docbook.

			David Lawyer
> 
> cheers,
> serge
> 
> ______________________
> http://lists.tldp.org/
> 
> 

On Thu, 10 May 2012, David Lawyer wrote:

> In my option linuxdoc is preferred, next comes wiki text, and docbook
> is least preferred.

And in *my* option, cuneiform on clay tablets is preferred above all
else....

Linuxdoc is dead.
In this field, markup specialists use docbook; everyone else uses
spray-cans on internet walls.

Can we now please get over it ?

[PS - the correct English spelling is : "contributOr".
Just thought someone on the list might like to know.]
-- 
Martin Wheeler
http://martinwheeler.net/journal

Le 11/05/2012 07:56, Martin Wheeler a écrit :

> Linuxdoc is dead.

LDP is nearly dead.. and such post do not help surviving

jdd