discuss: Thread: slashdot

David, 
  I like the way you handled it on /.  , gratz :)

JohnFlux

On Thu, Dec 06, 2001 at 11:52:55PM +0000, John Peter Tapsell wrote:
> David, 
>   I like the way you handled it on /.  , gratz :)

Thank you, kind sir. It was a struggle not to bitch-slap some of those
idiots.

-- 
Dr. David C. Merrill                     http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project                   ####@####.####
Collection Editor & Coordinator            http://www.linuxdoc.org

Microsoft is like this intellectual roach motel: big brains go in and you
don't see anything come out."
	--Paul Saffo, Institute for the Future

Some weeks ago I tryed to publish a slashdot paper describing the new
LDP layout and asking for help.

The paper was rejected. Alas I dont't have a copy and don't find on
slashdot a way to find my submission (not important).

We need still volunteers.

Could somebody with slashdot knowledge make some paper in a slashdot
acceptable manner? any similar paper in linux forums would be also
appreciated

thanks
jdd
-- 
jdd for the Linux Documentation Project
http://wiki.tldp.org
http://www.dodin.net

On Tue, Dec 02, 2008 at 08:45:22AM +0100, jdd for http://tldp.org wrote:
> Some weeks ago I tryed to publish a slashdot paper describing the new
> LDP layout and asking for help.
> 

Well, its is not slashdot paper. /. is the news for nerds and stuff
that matters.
The way to go about with it is first write an article on lwn.net or
linux.com or any other reputed Linux journal and then reference this
article at slashdot in a NEWS format and not neccessarily call for
help format.

Thanks,
Senthil