[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
traditional chain processing
From: "jdd for http://tldp.org" ####@####.#### Date: 24 Oct 2008 20:26:08 +0100 Message-Id: <490220E3.5080903@dodin.org> mail exchange between Greg Fergusson and me gave most infos (below). Svetoslav, what are the problems with xml? can you from these infos make clear the scripts for wiki<->oolchain? thanks jdd traditional data flow: 1. Data copied up to the ibiblio server 2. Data published using my ldp_mk script. Entire toolchain is present on the ibiblio server. Script creates all variants: HTML, HTML single file, PDF, Postscript, text, pluckerDB). 3. Data copied into proper locations (and packaged if need be) using script ldp_cp data content On Fri, 2008-10-24 at 20:57 +0200 > > Greg Ferguson a écrit : (...) For docbook - The docbook parser - jade w/DSSSL-stylesheets - is used. It works great. I realize the toolchain is a bit outdated (e.g. not using xslt/xsltproc), but trust me...it works wonderfully. If the parser fails badly, the doc goes back to the author. I rarely have that happen. For linuxdoc - The sgmltools toolchain is used. Again, works just fine. And the same construct goes: if the parser fails badly, the doc goes right back to the author. I rarely have that happen. text - no way -- ignored and author informed they need to submit in a given markup. I tell them to subscribe to the discussion list to ask for help, if needed. I have not had that occur in years. > > I was said few time ago than many xml LDP files are faulty (I'm not > > competent enough myself to know why nor how). No way. Most everything that is submitted is solid, or it's returned. There might be minor tag violations, but it's not enough to worry about, and it's certainly not something that would halt the process. > > So? was this hand made? The scripts and putting the tools together? Yes, I did that. Oh, also, part of my steps are to check the file(s) into CVS if the author has not done that. Sometimes, if they use CVS, they tell me where the doc is in the tree (let me know in their submit msg to ####@####.#### I do a cvs update, and run the process. Otherwise, they send the files (again, attached as gzip tar to their message to ####@####.#### and I perform the steps I outlined (including checking the files into CVS). -- Greg -- jdd for the Linux Documentation Project http://wiki.tldp.org http://www.dodin.net | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |