discuss: Proposal for revised license and license requirements.


Previous by date: 5 Jun 2005 18:21:51 -0000 Re: Proposal for revised license and license requirements., Andrew M.A. Cater
Next by date: 5 Jun 2005 18:21:51 -0000 Re: Proposal for revised license and license requirements., Randy Kramer
Previous in thread: 5 Jun 2005 18:21:51 -0000 Re: Proposal for revised license and license requirements., Andrew M.A. Cater
Next in thread: 5 Jun 2005 18:21:51 -0000 Re: Proposal for revised license and license requirements., Randy Kramer

Subject: Re: Proposal for revised license and license requirements.
From: Mendel Cooper ####@####.####
Date: 5 Jun 2005 18:21:51 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.50.0506051115070.1259-100000@localhost.localdomain>

Suggestion:

That the right to update/modify/alter documents be assigned to the LDP, and
that such right be reassignable to authors the the LDP designates. It's
understood, of course, that the LDP will safeguard documents from predatory
commercial exploitation (as was the case with the SCO Group, for example).

Previous by date: 5 Jun 2005 18:21:51 -0000 Re: Proposal for revised license and license requirements., Andrew M.A. Cater
Next by date: 5 Jun 2005 18:21:51 -0000 Re: Proposal for revised license and license requirements., Randy Kramer
Previous in thread: 5 Jun 2005 18:21:51 -0000 Re: Proposal for revised license and license requirements., Andrew M.A. Cater
Next in thread: 5 Jun 2005 18:21:51 -0000 Re: Proposal for revised license and license requirements., Randy Kramer


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.