discuss: revhistory question


Previous by date: 1 Feb 2001 09:11:56 -0000 From mini-HOWTO author, Miroslav Skoric
Next by date: 1 Feb 2001 09:11:56 -0000 Re: revhistory question, Greg Ferguson
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 1 Feb 2001 09:11:56 -0000 Re: revhistory question, Greg Ferguson

Subject: revhistory question
From: Roel van Meer ####@####.####
Date: 1 Feb 2001 09:11:56 -0000
Message-Id: <3A79285B.14D8FB8F@alt001.com>

Hello,

i was wondering -- Is it necessary to keep a <REVISION> section in the
<REVHISTORY> for each revision of the document, or only for the last
(one/few). It seems logical to me to keep them all there, but i wonder
how much information it really contributes to the reader. i think it
only makes the document harder to read.

Any suggestions?

/roel

--
1A First Alternative ####@####.####    www.alt001.com
Linvision BV         ####@####.#### (www|devel).linvision.com
--

Previous by date: 1 Feb 2001 09:11:56 -0000 From mini-HOWTO author, Miroslav Skoric
Next by date: 1 Feb 2001 09:11:56 -0000 Re: revhistory question, Greg Ferguson
Previous in thread:
Next in thread: 1 Feb 2001 09:11:56 -0000 Re: revhistory question, Greg Ferguson


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.