discuss: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook (was Re: Staff Election)


Previous by date: 12 Mar 2005 05:04:53 -0000 Re: LDP "non-free" documents, Rick Moen
Next by date: 12 Mar 2005 05:04:53 -0000 Re: Webstat Software, Binh Nguyen
Previous in thread: 12 Mar 2005 05:04:53 -0000 Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook (was Re: Staff Election), Binh Nguyen
Next in thread: 12 Mar 2005 05:04:53 -0000 Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook (was Re: Staff Election), Binh Nguyen

Subject: Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook (was Re: Staff Election)
From: Binh Nguyen ####@####.####
Date: 12 Mar 2005 05:04:53 -0000
Message-Id: <1081abc9050311210467fcde25@mail.gmail.com>

On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 13:40:43 +0000 (GMT), Martin Wheeler
####@####.#### wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2005, Jorge Godoy wrote:
> 
> > I suggest new documents come in DocBook XML only...  It is becoming the
> > standard and the de facto DTD for technical documentation.
> 
> Agreed and seconded.

Thirded.

Binh.

Previous by date: 12 Mar 2005 05:04:53 -0000 Re: LDP "non-free" documents, Rick Moen
Next by date: 12 Mar 2005 05:04:53 -0000 Re: Webstat Software, Binh Nguyen
Previous in thread: 12 Mar 2005 05:04:53 -0000 Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook (was Re: Staff Election), Binh Nguyen
Next in thread: 12 Mar 2005 05:04:53 -0000 Re: LinuxDoc vs. DocBook (was Re: Staff Election), Binh Nguyen


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.