discuss: [RFC] General Guide


Previous by date: 28 May 2016 11:53:33 +0100 Re: [RFC] General Guide, Martin A. Brown
Next by date: 28 May 2016 11:53:33 +0100 When can I submit a revised HOWTO to submit@en-tldp.org?, David Lawyer
Previous in thread: 28 May 2016 11:53:33 +0100 Re: [RFC] General Guide, Martin A. Brown
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: [RFC] General Guide
From: ####@####.####
Date: 28 May 2016 11:53:33 +0100
Message-Id: <20160528065252.7ea84645@ulgy_thing>

On Fri, 20 May 2016 09:49:30 ####@####.#### wrote:
> Greetings David,
> 
> >I apologize for the delay, I decided to write it in FAQ format and  
> 
> FAQ is good--thank you for sending this in!
> 
> We have a few FAQs already and, in fact, but with the retirement of 
> David Merrill's "Linux-FAQ", we don't have any that are targetted at 
> a general user trying to orient him/herself in the Linux landscape.
> 
> >I wanted to see if the other languages for docs would support several
> >separate TOCs.   
> 
> DocBook can certainly generate ToCs for sections as well as the main 
> article or book.
> 
> >I wound up using plain had written xhtml.  
> 
> That's a fine way to start.  Before submission and publication, we 
> would need to convert it into one of the source formats that we can 
> currently support.  These are:
> 
>   * Linuxdoc
>   * Asciidoc
>   * Docbook XML 4.x
>   * Docbook XML 5.x
>   * Docbook SGML 4.x [not recommended]
> 
> I (and others) can help you choose a format that addresses your 
> desire for section ToCs and also with the transformation.
> 
> >EDIT: (Then I learned that I needed to compress it before sending).
> >This is only a draft, I expect to increase it's size. I noticed 
> >that a couple of the questions I answer are answered in the LDPs 
> >dictionary.  
> 
> There will always be overlap.  And, that's not a bad thing.
> 
> >Interestingly enough, there are also a few apps in the dictionary, 
> >like games. I'd argue that they do not belong there and want a bit 
> >of an idea where my QA style guide ends and where the LD should 
> >begin. Tell me what you think of my guide so far, this is an RFC.  
> 
> I will read and review your document and send you comments directly.
> 

All you have said and proposed is fine with me. As I know html well I'd
prefer to keep writing my local copy in xhtml for the time being. I don't
expect the work to be comprehensive for a least 3 months. That is because
I love contributing to linux (since helps others of course :) , and I'm
currently contributing to 3 projects in less active development then most
including the LDP.

Sincerely, David

Previous by date: 28 May 2016 11:53:33 +0100 Re: [RFC] General Guide, Martin A. Brown
Next by date: 28 May 2016 11:53:33 +0100 When can I submit a revised HOWTO to submit@en-tldp.org?, David Lawyer
Previous in thread: 28 May 2016 11:53:33 +0100 Re: [RFC] General Guide, Martin A. Brown
Next in thread:


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.