| Previous by date: | 3 May 2016 17:43:53 +0100 updated plan of action for TLDP improvement(s), Martin A. Brown |
| Next by date: | 3 May 2016 17:43:53 +0100 [RFC] General Guide, David Niklas |
| Previous in thread: | |
| Next in thread: |
Hello all,
It has been awhile since I posted anything. I thought I would
provide a progress update:
* We can automatically publish at the moment (and you can find
the automatically published documents listed by stem name
underneath http://tldp.org/en/${STEM}/). See earlier mail [0].
* Migration scripts are ready, but I don't think I'm ready to pull
the migration trigger yet.
* I have learned Debian packaging to send python-tldp into the
Debian project. If you are interested in the gory detail, you
can read it all in Debian bug #822722 [1].
* I am currently working on correcting our usage of the XSL and
DSSSL filesin concert with submitting python-tldp to the Debian
project and updating the ldp-docbook-stylesheets package.
So, while doing that, one of the Debian folk pointed me to a
discussion on debian-www about TLDP. I made my reply to the
original poster, but I think there's some (understandable) concern
about the liveliness of TLDP and a perception that some (many?) of
the documents are outdated. See mailing list thread that starts
here [3].
Of course, I plan on continuing on my efforts, but I thought it
would be remiss not to share this exchange here.
Bye for now!
-Martin
[0] http://lists.tldp.org/go.to?list=discuss&cmd=showmsg&msgnum=12897
[1] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=822722
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=823237
[3] https://lists.debian.org/debian-www/2016/05/msg00005.html
--
Martin A. Brown
http://linux-ip.net/
| Previous by date: | 3 May 2016 17:43:53 +0100 updated plan of action for TLDP improvement(s), Martin A. Brown |
| Next by date: | 3 May 2016 17:43:53 +0100 [RFC] General Guide, David Niklas |
| Previous in thread: | |
| Next in thread: |