discuss: Should GFDL-1.3 be in LDP's accepted license list? was [New document: Linux and Android HOWT]
Subject:
Should GFDL-1.3 be in LDP's accepted license list? was [New document:
Linux and Android HOWT]
From:
"Martin A. Brown" ####@####.####
Date:
6 Mar 2016 01:23:25 +0000
Message-Id: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1603051718330.19013@znpeba.jbaqresebt.arg>
Hello all,
Guido has supplied an updated Linux-Android-HOWTO.sgml document.
He has also clarified that his chosen license is, indeed, GFDL-1.3.
Should the GFDL-1.3 be in our accepted list?
> * This document refers to an unversioned GFDL (by link [0]). The
> current version at that link is GFDL-1.3. It is not in the list
> of currently-accepted TLDP licenses [1]. Should it be?
>
> * Does anybody know somebody with some Android expertise who can
> provide a technical review of the content?
I noticed that, at least, jdd reported some knowledge/awareness of
Android. If anybody elso would like to review the document, please
holler.
And, also, I will perform a language (and markup) review once an
appropriate technical reviewer has had a crack at the document.
Best regards,
-Martin
--
Martin A. Brown
http://linux-ip.net/