discuss: anybody here used DocBook 5.0?


Previous by date: 10 Feb 2016 05:18:55 +0000 Re: anybody here used DocBook 5.0?, Leo Noordergraaf
Next by date: 10 Feb 2016 05:18:55 +0000 Re: Plain text documents, David Lawyer
Previous in thread: 10 Feb 2016 05:18:55 +0000 Re: anybody here used DocBook 5.0?, Leo Noordergraaf
Next in thread:

Subject: Re: anybody here used DocBook 5.0?
From: "Martin A. Brown" ####@####.####
Date: 10 Feb 2016 05:18:55 +0000
Message-Id: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1602092118450.4325@qnttre.jbaqresebt.arg>

Good evening!

>I used DocBook 5 on the Linux Assembly HOWTO.
>
>I used xmlto with dblatex to generate pdf, xmlto itself is able to
>generate epub and html versions.
>
>I haven't used namespaces as I converted an older, no longer maintained,
>document to docbook 5.
>
>Commands used (lifted from makefile):
>xmlto --with-dblatex pdf Assembly-HOWTO.xml
>xmlto epub Assembly-HOWTO.xml
>xmlto html Assembly-HOWTO.xml

Thank you much!  I have not yet used xmlto (though xsltproc, xmldiff 
and xmllint).  Much appreciated.  I'll try that tomorrow.

-Martin

>> Has anybody here used DocBook 5.0 yet?  I have not.
>> 
>> I have skimmed through parts of the DocBook 5.0 transition guide:
>> 
>>   http://www.docbook.org/docs/howto/
>> 
>> My observations:
>> 
>>   * The namespace bits seem powerful and one of the big reasons 
>>     anybody would choose DocBook 5.0.  My lay understanding is that
>>     this allows multiple XML vocabularies to be used intermixed in
>>     a single document.
>> 
>>   * The toolchain looks largely the same as the xsltproc + XSL 
>>     toolchain that I've grown accustomed to using with DocBook XML.
>> 
>>   * I saw xlink:href elements in some DocBook 4.x documents in our 
>>     collection and wondered why somebody had used that notation.  
>>     Now, I know.  This would be a valid declaration for a DocBook 
>>     5.0 document in which somebody wanted to included links to,
>>     let's say, other websites:
>> 
>>       <article xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" version="5.0"
>>                xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">
>> 
>> Anyway, I'm asking if anybody else has used DocBook 5.0 and would 
>> share any (other) tips, pointers, Makefiles, CLI invocations or such 
>> jazz.
>> 
>> -Martin
>> 
>> P.S. Yes, I'm also lurking on the public docbook and docbook-apps 
>>   mailing lists where the DocBook standard and some of the 
>>   toolchains are discussed.  Hoping to osmotically absorb some 
>>   knowledge there.
>> 
>
>
>______________________
>http://lists.tldp.org/
>
>
>

-- 
Martin A. Brown
http://linux-ip.net/

Previous by date: 10 Feb 2016 05:18:55 +0000 Re: anybody here used DocBook 5.0?, Leo Noordergraaf
Next by date: 10 Feb 2016 05:18:55 +0000 Re: Plain text documents, David Lawyer
Previous in thread: 10 Feb 2016 05:18:55 +0000 Re: anybody here used DocBook 5.0?, Leo Noordergraaf
Next in thread:


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.