discuss: Q: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ was [New Guide: Package Management Basics]
Subject:
Re: Q: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ was [New
Guide: Package Management Basics]
From:
"Martin A. Brown" ####@####.####
Date:
29 Jan 2016 05:41:12 +0000
Message-Id: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1601282131180.2025@znpeba.jbaqresebt.arg>
Hello there,
>> And, looking for our accepted licenses, I found link rot in this
>> page, with regard to the DFSG licenses:
>>
>> http://www.tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/html/doc-licensing.html
>
>Just submitted an update.
Great! Thank you!
>Looks like CC SA has been retired so I’ve removed that as well and
>updated CC BY-SA to point to 4.0.
DFSG seems to consider CC-BY-SA 3.0 and CC-BY-SA 4.0 in the
acceptable category.
I would still like to hear from our license aficionados.
The question remains about TLDP's position on accepting documents
licensed with CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0.
>Also started updating documentation to use git. I’m figuring this
>out quickly so I think there will be other updates soon.
OK, very good. If anybody else has suggestions for workflow,
tools, links, concepts or even books around git, now is a great time
to holler.
I think that, in the LDP-Author-Guide, we should, at least, point
out that it is not required to get a github.com account to send us
patches. The old submit@ address can be resurrected and we can take
patches there. This is the wonderful thing about a DVCS. No
lock-in!
-Martin
--
Martin A. Brown
http://linux-ip.net/
