| Previous by date: | 28 Jan 2016 23:46:44 +0000 Re: new acounts, Paul Hendricksen |
| Next by date: | 28 Jan 2016 23:46:44 +0000 Re: Q: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ was [New Guide: Package Management Basics], Mark Komarinski |
| Previous in thread: | |
| Next in thread: | 28 Jan 2016 23:46:44 +0000 Re: Q: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ was [New Guide: Package Management Basics], Mark Komarinski |
Hello discuss, [particularly Rick Moen and David Lawyer, if present] Jason has licensed his document as: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ I see that this is in the DFSG [0] list. Should it go on TLDP's list of accepted licenses, as well? Jason, >It was intentional but an unimportant detail. I can rename the >file and re-push it to github. Right-o. I will review your Package-Management-Basics.xml document and send you feedback privately (by tomorrow midday). Mark Komarinski, And, looking for our accepted licenses, I found link rot in this page, with regard to the DFSG licenses: http://www.tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/html/doc-licensing.html -Martin [0] https://wiki.debian.org/DFSGLicenses -- Martin A. Brown http://linux-ip.net/
| Previous by date: | 28 Jan 2016 23:46:44 +0000 Re: new acounts, Paul Hendricksen |
| Next by date: | 28 Jan 2016 23:46:44 +0000 Re: Q: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ was [New Guide: Package Management Basics], Mark Komarinski |
| Previous in thread: | |
| Next in thread: | 28 Jan 2016 23:46:44 +0000 Re: Q: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ was [New Guide: Package Management Basics], Mark Komarinski |