discuss: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas


Previous by date: 26 Dec 2012 20:19:16 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, Michael Mol
Next by date: 26 Dec 2012 20:19:16 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, jdd
Previous in thread: 26 Dec 2012 20:19:16 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, Michael Mol
Next in thread: 26 Dec 2012 20:19:16 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, jdd

Subject: RE: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas
From: "Paul Hendricksen" ####@####.####
Date: 26 Dec 2012 20:19:16 +0000
Message-Id: <!&!AAAAAAAAAAAYAAAAAAAAAF+K0OIWPRNHtH8KWC14LSMigQAAEAAAAB5l8G6z/WNEuC5V6liNjj4BAAAAAA==@gmail.com>

Is TLDP a structured non-profit or is it just a group?

Respectfully,

Paul Hendricksen


-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Mol ####@####.#### 
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 1:02 PM
To: Paul Hendricksen
Cc: ####@####.####
Subject: Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas

That would require copyright assignment. I don't believe TLDP does that.

On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Paul Hendricksen ####@####.#### wrote:
> The submission, regardless of the license is the property of the TLDP 
> and is subject to the hosts licenses. Right?
>
> Respectfully,
>
> Paul Hendricksen
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Lawyer ####@####.####
> Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2012 12:01 PM
> To: jdd
> Cc: ####@####.####
> Subject: Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas
>
> On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 06:56:23PM +0100, jdd wrote:
>> our worst problem is the licence problem many document still have no 
>> or unfriendly licence not allowing modification
>>
>> jdd
> At one time (many years ago) the LDP stated that any Doc submitted 
> without a license was considered to be published under the free LDP 
> license (aka "boilerplate license).  Then LDP changed it's policy to 
> require that any Doc submitted have a license.  But a few docs. may 
> have been accepted by mistake.
> The mistake is due both to the author not having a license and the LDP 
> for accepting it.
>
> But LDP should adhere to the rules.  It will not likely cause any 
> serious problem to do so since the Docs. in question are likely 
> obsolete and need rewriting.  Copyright law can be enforced with 
> criminal penalties although it doesn't happen often.
>
>                         David Lawyer
>
> ______________________
> http://lists.tldp.org/
>
>
>
> ______________________
> http://lists.tldp.org/
>



--
:wq


Previous by date: 26 Dec 2012 20:19:16 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, Michael Mol
Next by date: 26 Dec 2012 20:19:16 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, jdd
Previous in thread: 26 Dec 2012 20:19:16 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, Michael Mol
Next in thread: 26 Dec 2012 20:19:16 +0000 Re: Linux Documentation needs much work and ideas, jdd


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.