discuss: Modernization/Re-Design of Website
Subject:
Re: [discuss] Modernization/Re-Design of Website
From:
"." ####@####.####
Date:
26 Apr 2011 04:16:38 +0100
Message-Id: <-6630805903911147038@unknownmsgid>
Exactly my feeling as well. What JDD wants is both a wiki and static
copy. Rick, making his point very clear, is that there is no standard.
But JDD is the fearless leader, so I'd say use DocBook after writing
it, keep the office suite copy and cut and paste for that to the two
different formats.
I know that sounds like a lot of work, I'm devising a plan to propose
to the group to simplify that process.
-Paul
On Apr 25, 2011, at 21:08, Bruce Hill ####@####.#### wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 07:45:02PM -0700, Rick Moen wrote:
>>
>> He said 'got positive feedback from the discussion list' but somehow got
>> the impression that submissions aren't accepted in any format other than
>> DocBook. I personally never heard that. What I always saw,
>> consistently over a period of many years, were statements (paraphrasing
>> those here, obviously) that you are welcome to submit just about
>> anything withing reason, and that LDP's volunteers will then help you
>> whip it into shape.
>>
>> If there material somewhere that says DocBook is required, let's find that.
>> Maybe Angelo can tell us.
>
> This link explains the guidelines for submissions:
>
> http://www.tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/html/index.html
>
> My kernel rebuild guide was never posted because it appeared to me that
> writing text in vim and submitting was not permissable.
>
> A short (not multi-page HTML) explanation might help some of us who are
> not inclined to read so much about this.
>
> Bruce
> --
> "Experience is a hard teacher because she gives the test first, the
> lesson afterward. But properly learned, the lesson forever changes
> the man."
>
> ______________________
> http://lists.tldp.org/
>
