discuss: Inappropriate contents


Previous by date: 17 Nov 2009 11:13:15 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, David Lawyer
Next by date: 17 Nov 2009 11:13:15 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, Sergiusz Pawlowicz
Previous in thread: 17 Nov 2009 11:13:15 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, David Lawyer
Next in thread: 17 Nov 2009 11:13:15 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, Sergiusz Pawlowicz

Subject: Re: [discuss] Inappropriate contents
From: walter harms ####@####.####
Date: 17 Nov 2009 11:13:15 +0000
Message-Id: <4B0284A4.7030506@bfs.de>


Robert M Parten II schrieb:
> I would believe that inappropriate would include the following genres:
> 
> pornography (OF ALL KINDS)
> racist based websites
> anti-semitic
> sexist
> any site recommending or promoting the use of illegal drugs
> any site recommending or promoting the use of illegally obtained software
> 
> PR is vital to the open source community (in my opinion). I know we
> don't intend to model ourselves around corporate giants, but we need
> think like them when promoting our software. Having links to
> pornographic websites is not considered professional and usually will
> only give the community a bad name.
> 
> Is it possible that the monitoring of mirrors can be delegated to
> certain individuals or can this be a community effort?
> 
> 
> 

I think TLDP is going a very slippery way. What exactly means e.g. ''pornography''
depends of the country you life in. An who will judge this ?

Either you allow advertising/sponsoring or not

re,
 wh


Previous by date: 17 Nov 2009 11:13:15 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, David Lawyer
Next by date: 17 Nov 2009 11:13:15 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, Sergiusz Pawlowicz
Previous in thread: 17 Nov 2009 11:13:15 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, David Lawyer
Next in thread: 17 Nov 2009 11:13:15 +0000 Re: Inappropriate contents, Sergiusz Pawlowicz


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.