discuss: Limits on doc licensing's significance
Subject:
Re: [discuss] Limits on doc licensing's significance
From:
Randy Kramer ####@####.####
Date:
4 Oct 2008 22:06:12 +0100
Message-Id: <200810041707.06548.rhkramer@gmail.com>
On Saturday 04 October 2008 03:54 am, jdd wrote:
> just a present exemple. Two HOWTOs aiming to howto edit documents have
> been written, one with explicit licence (mine), the other without any
> (randy's). Strictly speaking it's impossible to merge them, however I
> proposed to merge and Randy agreed, it was simply obvious that they
> where made in this goal. In most case this is not a problem.
I know this wasn't the main point of your post, but just for the record:
* I didn't even think about the need for a license, my intent was to
"contribute" what I wrote under the default license of the TLDP
(whatever that turns out to be)
* Yes, absolutely they can be merged--I wasn't really trying to write
a "new" HOWTO, but I had trouble seeing how to comment on what you
wrote, so I thought a new attempt, trying to say some of the same
things you were saying might be useful (or not)
Anyway, feel free to merge it however it makes sense (or not)--I'm sure
other will have comments as well as it gets closer to agreement.
Randy Kramer
--
I didn't have time to write a short letter, so I created a video
instead.--with apologies to Cicero, et.al.
