discuss: licence problems
Subject:
Re: [discuss] licence problems
From:
jdd ####@####.####
Date:
26 Sep 2008 16:58:50 +0100
Message-Id: <48DD068F.5000708@dodin.org>
Rick Moen a écrit :
> Let's look at that. The Software Freedom Law Center -- one of the few
> that I really respect
simple to ask them directly, they advertise giving advices for no charge
You may understand that I don't challenge you expertise. But in case
we have to answer to somebody else about HOWTOs licence, it's much
better to be able to reference an external source (nor you nor I).
understand also that what I try to acheive is letting the LDP work as
smoothly as possible. We can't spend days in searching for the better
licence for each and any document, there are too many.
we need simple, understandable by any, procedure, so I repeat here the
end of my previous mail it's that who need badly an answer :-)
* is the *present* default licence (GFDL without...) filling our goal?
* if not what can we do?
* How can we, practically, know if a document proposed for LDP
inclusion is compatible with our goals? What do we have to do to
ensure this (is the optional licence list compatible? what do we have
to see in the document to know we can keep it?)
jdd
--
http://www.dodin.net
http://valerie.dodin.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-eic8MSSfM
