[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Bugs in linuxdoc fixed
From: David Lawyer ####@####.#### Date: 18 Apr 2007 08:24:41 -0000 Message-Id: <20070418082309.GC5348@davespc> I just filed a bug report with Debian regarding overstrikes and escape sequences in the text output of LinuxDoc. And I was amazed that I got a response the next day from someone who isn't the maintainer but is fixing it. I sent in a patch and he's proposed an alternate patch which I don't completely agree with, but at least something is being done. Also, I received notices that two of my previously reported bugs (one I reported several years ago) have been fixed but I haven't got around yet to verifying that they really have been fixed. Now if we could only find someone to develop linuxdoc-sgml so that it can have all the tags that docbook has, but maintain the ability to allow the user to omit 2/3 of the tags resulting in a much cleaner appearance and ease of creation. There would also be a subset with fewer tags than linuxdoc now has, making this subset version easier to use than the current linuxdoc. David Lawyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [discuss] Bugs in linuxdoc fixed
From: steven aatkinson ####@####.#### Date: 22 Apr 2007 03:01:03 -0000 Message-Id: <901508.89035.qm@web51811.mail.re2.yahoo.com> > just filed a bug report with Debian regarding overstrikes and escape > sequences in the text output of LinuxDoc. And I was amazed that I got > a response the next day... Great. Do we have a link we could use for linuxdoc-tools instead of the old (missing) authors page ? --------------------------------- Ahhh...imagining that irresistible "new car" smell? Check outnew cars at Yahoo! Autos. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |