discuss: Thread: Re: Proposed modification of Manifesto. Last chance to object.

I just belatedly replied to the message of Siward de Groot regarding
my proposed change to a section of the LDP Manifesto.  I think we have
had a consensus to modify the Manifesto per my draft that I posted on
30 Oct. 2005 which was a slight modification to what I posted on 5
Oct. 2005.  Any objections to to making this change?  There's been a
lot of time to think this over.  If you can't find my Oct. 2005
email, look at the one I just posted today (19 Feb. 2006) but it's
not as easy to read (It has my proposal lines prefixed by > |). 

Other sections need changing too, but that can be done later on.

			David Lawyer

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


On Sun, 19 Feb 2006, David Lawyer wrote:

> I just belatedly replied to the message of Siward de Groot regarding
> my proposed change to a section of the LDP Manifesto.  I think we have
> had a consensus to modify the Manifesto per my draft that I posted on
> 30 Oct. 2005 which was a slight modification to what I posted on 5
> Oct. 2005.  Any objections to to making this change?  There's been a
> lot of time to think this over.  If you can't find my Oct. 2005
> email, look at the one I just posted today (19 Feb. 2006) but it's
> not as easy to read (It has my proposal lines prefixed by > |).

I agree with what was proposed in October.

Tille.

- --
Machtelt Garrels                ####@####.####
Review Coordinator    	 	http://www.tldp.org/authors/

My Penguin, my freedom.         http://tille.xalasys.com

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFD+dEwsIIUbMXbBA8RAnr3AJ4sSMD8SV76l8/sJ4ajmS8vpNkd4QCgseoD
F4arl6JuE6Zfq6emxlMNxl8=
=2S18
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----