[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
[please stop!]
From: Sergiusz Pawlowicz ####@####.#### Date: 22 May 2004 07:32:27 -0000 Message-Id: <20040522073230.GC29659@szafa> please stop the discuss about religion here. this is the list about documenting software and hardware. please treat my words seriously, or you will be removed. sergiusz, TLDP listmaster -- private: http://ibiblio.org/ser/ | company: http://a-k-f.com jabber: ####@####.#### | mobile: +48 502 660860 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: [please stop!]
From: "Rodolfo J. Paiz" ####@####.#### Date: 22 May 2004 08:46:54 -0000 Message-Id: <6.1.0.6.0.20040522022849.02589410@mail.simpaticus.com> At 01:32 5/22/2004, Sergiusz Pawlowicz wrote: >please stop the discuss about religion here. this is the >list about documenting software and hardware. > >please treat my words seriously, or you will be removed. Sergiuzs, First: Perhaps you could be a little more specific? It's hard to say whether you're demanding that *all* discussion about Teus's proposed document cease forthwith, or that only discussions specifically about the beliefs of any person or group be discontinued. Also, it's impossible to understand, given the English-language use of "you" for both plural and singular, whether you are directing this message at any particular person or to everyone who has participated in this discussion. Any clarification will make it easier to follow the listmaster's instructions. Second: That being said, I would also like to suggest that this threat of immediate and summary removal from the list is a very, very heavy-handed approach to controlling the discussion. I'm very saddened to see you taking this approach, since it's the first time in my 10 years of Linux use that I've seen an open and (largely) productive discussion on a valid subject get slammed shut like that. Note that the "valid subject" I refer to is whether or not to include Teus's HOWTO, not any discussion about religion per se. I haven't been around here for very long, but the mailing lists page [1] says that people should join these mailing lists "in order to be involved and stay informed about the work being done by the LDP." That includes objectives, principles, and philosophy, right? That page also says this list (discuss) is a "general discussion list." And lastly, I have seen several long and involved discussions around here that were philosophical in nature and involved questions of principle, of scope, and specific discussion about whether LDP did or did not wish to include certain documents based on their content and nature. Al Dev comes to mind as one, Encouraging Women in Linux is another. Those issues *really* got tense and difficult, whereas this one, apart from one crack Doug Jensen took at me a couple of hours ago, seems to me to have been very civilized so far. And I may have somehow pissed him off by mistake, so let's write that one off too. But we hashed them out and got through it, and I certainly learned a lot and grew to respect several subscribers to this list a great deal. Why is this inappropriate, but those were OK? And why is this suddenly the list "about documenting software and hardware" when it has previously been very open to *any* general topic of interest to LDP? Do as you will. But I will personally be shocked and disappointed if your message is Company Policy, so to speak. Not at all the image I have of this group, this project, and this philosophy. [1] http://www.tldp.org/mailinfo.html#maillists -- Rodolfo J. Paiz ####@####.#### http://www.simpaticus.com | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] |