| [<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject:
GCC HOWTO
From: Machtelt Garrels ####@####.#### Date: 16 Apr 2004 06:12:54 -0000 Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0404160111530.13696-100000@server1.us.soti.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Another candidate for the unmaintained list? I'm not an expert in this... Tille. - -- My Penguin, my freedom. http://tille.soti.org - ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 23:38:46 -0600 From: Korey Fort ####@####.#### To: ####@####.#### Subject: General Hi, I noticed that the GCC HOWTO is very out of date. I don't know if you have thought of it, but wouldn't be easier to use the GCC Manaual from the GCC Developers? Just my little suggestion, keep up the great work! "Let ye without Segmentation Fault cast the first int!" Korey Fort - -- ___________________________________________________________ Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: ####@####.#### For additional commands, e-mail: ####@####.#### -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFAf3lgsIIUbMXbBA8RAiowAJ9wrlwgwO8q57fAYcs7HjeuL9AVoQCePaiM 6nhgoDKj9cl045ACyfzMkLw= =L0YQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject:
Re: GCC HOWTO
From: "David Horton" ####@####.#### Date: 16 Apr 2004 21:59:02 -0000 Message-Id: <W51990434029051082152714@webmail1> > -----Original Message----- > From: Machtelt Garrels ####@####.#### > Sent: Friday, April 16, 2004 06:12 AM > To: ####@####.#### > Subject: GCC HOWTO > >> Hi, I noticed that the GCC HOWTO is very out of date. I don't know if you have thought of it, but wouldn't be easier to use the GCC Manaual from the GCC Developers? Just my little suggestion, keep up the great work! >> >> "Let ye without Segmentation Fault cast the first int!" >> >> Korey Fort >> > > > Another candidate for the unmaintained list? I'm not an expert in this... > > Tille. On the plus side, the HOWTO covers the topics of installation and basic use of GCC in a very straight-forward manner whereas the GCC Manual is very deep and verbose. The HOWTO also briefly covers installation of libraries which is nice. If I just wanted to get GCC installed and working I would probably have an easier time with the HOWTO. On the down side, the HOWTO is very out of date. Most of the information in the "Where to get things" section is so old that it is unusable. Dave | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Subject:
Re: GCC HOWTO
From: Emma Jane Hogbin ####@####.#### Date: 4 May 2004 21:21:30 -0000 Message-Id: <20040504211834.GL3841@smeagol> Hello Daniel, We recently received a notice that the GCC HOWTO is out of date. Your own web site, www.telent.net, contains the following warning: "Once upon a time I contributed actively to it (mostly documentation; you might even still find copies of the ELF- and GCC-HOWTOs around, but I encourage you to disregard them unless someone has since done a fairly massive cleanup job) but these days I tend mostly just to use it." Would you agree that the GCC HOWTO should be at least put into the unmaintained section of our website? Or perhaps removed completely? It is currently hosted at: http://tldp.org/HOWTO/GCC-HOWTO/index.html If your document is removed from the collection, can you suggest any other documents as replacement? thank you, emma -- Emma Jane Hogbin Review Coordinator, The Linux Documentation Project | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| [<<] [<] Page 1 of 1 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||