[<<] [<] Page 1 of 2 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: general
From: Machtelt Garrels ####@####.#### Date: 28 Oct 2003 16:29:13 -0000 Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0310281023490.5496-100000@server1.us.soti.org> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Thought this was worth posting on the discuss list as well (Carlo: subscription needed!) See below for more. On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Stramaglia, Carlo wrote: > I think there's an error in The Linux Network Administrator's Guide, Second > Edition. > > In section 2.2: > > Class A > Class A comprises networks 1.0.0.0 through 127.0.0.0. The network > number is contained in the first octet. This class provides for a 24-bit > host part, allowing roughly 1.6 million hosts per network. > > I think instead it allows "....16 million hosts per network." > > > > Just to be exact. This entire guide needs updating, if you ask me, but the only reasonable contact address I could find in it is ####@####.#### I don't think it will help us much to use that address. Can we contact somebody, such as the authors, more directly on this and ask if they are still maintinging the document? Tille. - -- My Penguin, my freedom. http://tille.soti.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE/nplWsIIUbMXbBA8RAlEvAJsF2yECwaFYch1+Fe/q464DQSZTQACghpWl 3mPc3pGVrlq3Szr2EO8Pqtg= =9T32 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: general
From: David Lawyer ####@####.#### Date: 28 Oct 2003 21:35:06 -0000 Message-Id: <20031028213436.GC548@lafn.org> On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:29:07AM -0600, Machtelt Garrels wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Thought this was worth posting on the discuss list as well (Carlo: > subscription needed!) > See below for more. > > On Tue, 28 Oct 2003, Stramaglia, Carlo wrote: > > > I think there's an error in The Linux Network Administrator's Guide, Second > > Edition. > > > > In section 2.2: > > > > Class A > > Class A comprises networks 1.0.0.0 through 127.0.0.0. The network > > number is contained in the first octet. This class provides for a 24-bit > > host part, allowing roughly 1.6 million hosts per network. > > > > I think instead it allows "....16 million hosts per network." Since the last 3 bytes (24 bits) represent the host number, 2^24 is about 16 million (since 2^20 is about a million and 2^4=16). So 16 million is correct. > > > > Just to be exact. > > This entire guide needs updating, if you ask me, but the only reasonable > contact address I could find in it is ####@####.#### I don't think it > will help us much to use that address. > > Can we contact somebody, such as the authors, more directly on this and > ask if they are still maintaining the document? > > Tille. This should be marked as needed a new author in the database (what database :-). David Lawyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: general
From: Tabatha Marshall ####@####.#### Date: 28 Oct 2003 22:51:43 -0000 Message-Id: <1067381749.25154.35.camel@mysticchild> On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 13:34, David Lawyer wrote: > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:29:07AM -0600, Machtelt Garrels wrote: > > This entire guide needs updating, if you ask me, but the only reasonable > > contact address I could find in it is ####@####.#### I don't think it > > will help us much to use that address. > > > > Can we contact somebody, such as the authors, more directly on this and > > ask if they are still maintaining the document? > > > > Tille. > > This should be marked as needed a new author in the database (what > database :-). I believe if the authors can't be located via their known email address or web site (if it's in the document), and if Google can't turn up anything email or web, then we should make a note on the Unmaintained list, which is all we have for now. Tab -- Tabatha Marshall Web: www.merlinmonroe.com Linux Documentation Project Review Coordinator (http://www.tldp.org) Linux Counter Area Manager US:wa (http://counter.li.org) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: general
From: David Lawyer ####@####.#### Date: 29 Oct 2003 23:44:46 -0000 Message-Id: <20031029233707.GB758@lafn.org> > > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 10:29:07AM -0600, Machtelt Garrels wrote: > > > This entire guide needs updating, if you ask me, but the only reasonable > > > contact address I could find in it is ####@####.#### I don't think it > > > will help us much to use that address. > > > > > > Can we contact somebody, such as the authors, more directly on this and > > > ask if they are still maintaining the document? > > > > > > Tille. > On Tue, 2003-10-28 at 13:34, David Lawyer wrote: > > > > This should be marked as needed a new author in the database (what > > database :-). > On Tue, Oct 28, 2003 at 02:55:50PM -0800, Tabatha Marshall wrote: > I believe if the authors can't be located via their known email address > or web site (if it's in the document), and if Google can't turn up > anything email or web, then we should make a note on the Unmaintained > list, which is all we have for now. A while ago, moving something to the Unmaintained list meant essentially removing it from the collection. It wouldn't go out to the mirror sites and would be removed from the tarballs we distribute. But for the past couple years or so, they seem to remain in the main collection for years after they are put into Unmaintained. So what's in "Unmaintained" are really in two possible categories: Removed from the main collection or still in the main collection. David Lawyer | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: general
From: Tabatha Marshall ####@####.#### Date: 30 Oct 2003 19:34:33 -0000 Message-Id: <1067471807.26228.25.camel@mysticchild> On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 15:37, David Lawyer wrote: > A while ago, moving something to the Unmaintained list meant essentially > removing it from the collection. It wouldn't go out to the mirror sites > and would be removed from the tarballs we distribute. But for the past > couple years or so, they seem to remain in the main collection for years > after they are put into Unmaintained. So what's in "Unmaintained" are > really in two possible categories: Removed from the main collection or > still in the main collection. Duly noted. I'd be interested in finding out how many in the list are still being distributed. Would that be difficult/easy to determine? Tab -- Tabatha Marshall Web: www.merlinmonroe.com Linux Documentation Project Review Coordinator (http://www.tldp.org) Linux Counter Area Manager US:wa (http://counter.li.org) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: General
From: doug jensen ####@####.#### Date: 25 Nov 2003 23:18:43 -0000 Message-Id: <20031125233140.GA5851@ispwest.com> Plucked from the listserve archive: | On Wed, 2003-10-29 at 15:37, David Lawyer wrote: | > A while ago, moving something to the Unmaintained list meant essentially | > removing it from the collection. It wouldn't go out to the mirror sites | > and would be removed from the tarballs we distribute. But for the past | > couple years or so, they seem to remain in the main collection for years | > after they are put into Unmaintained. So what's in "Unmaintained" are | > really in two possible categories: Removed from the main collection or | > still in the main collection. | | Duly noted. I'd be interested in finding out how many in the list are | still being distributed. Would that be difficult/easy to determine? | | Tab Here's a list: Alpha-HOWTO - Last update 1997 Ftape-FAQ - Last update 1998 Hebrew-HOWTO - Last update 1995 LBX - Last update 1997 Netscape+Proxy - Last update 1997 NFS-Root - Last update 2002 Qmail+MH - Last update 1998 Soundblaster-AWE - Last update 1998 UMSDOS-HOWTO - Last update 2001 Visual-Bell - Last update 2001 Wacom-Tablet-HOWTO - Last update 2001 The HOWTOs that are on the Unmaintained list, but have new maintainers listed are _not_ included. -- Doug Jensen | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Fwd: general
From: Y Giridhar Appaji Nag ####@####.#### Date: 22 Nov 2004 12:25:04 -0000 Message-Id: <f383b2d004112204252e65471d@mail.gmail.com> Is this because the lists are heavily spam filtered? Unfortunately for me also, I can't send mails to The LDP lists. I am able to send email to ####@####.#### and I get a response for "confirmation". After I confirm my subscription nothing happens. I don't get any email saying that I have been added to the list or that I have been rejected for such and such reason and the list email does not get delivered to me. Is there any data I can provide to the list admins so that we can investigate this problem? It might be a good idea to have the filters publicly placed somewhere? Giridhar ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Roman Kuznetsov ####@####.#### Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:31:38 +0100 Subject: general To: ####@####.#### Hello, TLDP, i tried to submit my new document several times to submit@, but cannot see it in the subit-list archive. What has gone wrong? Mit freundlichen Gruessen and with kind regards Roman Kuznetsov Systola Muehlenhagen 130 D-20539 Hamburg Tel.: +49 40 730 91 572 Fax: +49 40 730 91 574 www.systola.de | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
RE: general
From: "Roman Kuznetsov" ####@####.#### Date: 22 Nov 2004 13:37:34 -0000 Message-Id: <20041122143118.D22ABBBC06@mail.systola.de> It there any way you can help me to post the doc for a review? Any alternative way for submitting? The document is also available online at http://www.systola.org/howto/overlap/overlap-en.cfm Any help is very much appreciated! Mit freundlichen Gruessen and with kind regards Roman Kuznetsov Systola Hamburg www.systola.de > -----Original Message----- > From: Y Giridhar Appaji Nag ####@####.#### > Sent: Montag, 22. November 2004 13:25 > To: ####@####.#### > Cc: ####@####.#### Roman Kuznetsov > Subject: Fwd: general > > Is this because the lists are heavily spam filtered? > > Unfortunately for me also, I can't send mails to The LDP > lists. I am able to send email to ####@####.#### > and I get a response for "confirmation". After I confirm my > subscription nothing happens. > I don't get any email saying that I have been added to the > list or that I have been rejected for such and such reason > and the list email does not get delivered to me. Is there > any data I can provide to the list admins so that we can > investigate this problem? > > It might be a good idea to have the filters publicly placed > somewhere? > > Giridhar > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Roman Kuznetsov ####@####.#### > Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2004 14:31:38 +0100 > Subject: general > To: ####@####.#### > > > Hello, TLDP, > > i tried to submit my new document several times to submit@, > but cannot see it in the subit-list archive. > What has gone wrong? > > Mit freundlichen Gruessen > and with kind regards > > Roman Kuznetsov > > Systola > Muehlenhagen 130 > D-20539 Hamburg > Tel.: +49 40 730 91 572 > Fax: +49 40 730 91 574 > www.systola.de > | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: general
From: Machtelt Garrels ####@####.#### Date: 4 Apr 2005 14:22:20 -0000 Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0504041424410.9931-100000@cobra.xalasys.com> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 30 Mar 2005, Helen wrote: > Hello, > > My email address, ####@####.#### appears on your webpage: > > http://lists.tldp.org/index.cgi?5:mss:5972:200310:jcmkjmhmagjnofifgbcg > > Can you please advise me why my email address is there? Can you please remove it? > > I recently took over this email address and have been despamming it for months now :( Hello Helen, Sorry to hear about this. Probably the previous user of this address got infected by a virus, and thus was open for spam. In those days, TLDP did not have a spam-filter yet, as you can see. We are not putting these messages on-line on purpose. We have an awful lot of them because our mailinglists were not protected. A big part of the spams have already been removed, but it takes time to filter out these bad messages. I'm addressing the TLDP discussion mailinglist (which is now checked for and protected from spam messages, rest assured) to see how we can speed up this process. Tille. - -- Machtelt Garrels ####@####.#### Co-editor of LDP Weekly News http://tldp.org/ldpwn/latest.html My Penguin, my freedom. http://tille.xalasys.com -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFCUU8CsIIUbMXbBA8RAl9yAJoCktEKR3+WLnDQywsZbAjMA5tHhACfRWkZ nAbPp+k3bgxPVUOhL9P7l5k= =D4pt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Fwd: general
From: Sergiusz Pawlowicz ####@####.#### Date: 12 Oct 2011 12:44:28 +0100 Message-Id: <CAPRDrAEQ2MjVM4bgiKm+GCFab=F2Ntm4fFv9H+skrC2o8YN3Tw@mail.gmail.com> hi! any volunteer to remove it? ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Martin de Niet ####@####.#### Date: Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:15 Subject: general To: @en.tldp.org Dear tlpd, in http://tldp.org/LDP/GNU-Linux-Tools-Summary/html/text-manipulation-tools.html under the 'chcase homepage.' anchor is a reference to a porno site, maybe you would like to remove that. best regards, Martin de Niet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 2 [>] [>>] |