[<<] [<] Page 1 of 3 [>] [>>] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Progress on the Anti-Spam HOWTO
From: chris albert ####@####.#### Date: 31 May 2003 00:12:20 -0000 Message-Id: <3ED7F360.1070406@mcgill.ca> Hi, I noticed that there was some discussion about writing an Anti-Spam HOWTO, around Sept 2002. Has that got off the ground? If so, I would like to help. If not, I am willing to start writing one. I had planned to concentrate on the technical issues of setting up anti-spam filtering both at the local level, the MUA level, as well as site-wide installations, the MTA tier, both using a mix of current best-of-breed open source technologies. All this information is available in discrete, distributed sources; however, I feel, that the time is right fot a LDP doc. Chris Albert Enterprise Systems Network and Communication Services McGill University christopher (period) albert (at) mcgill (dot) ca | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Progress on the Anti-Spam HOWTO
From: jdd ####@####.#### Date: 31 May 2003 05:14:14 -0000 Message-Id: <3ED83A24.8050307@dodin.net> chris albert wrote: > Hi, > I noticed that there was some discussion about writing an Anti-Spam > HOWTO, around Sept 2002. Has that got off the ground? > If so, I would like to help. If not, I am willing to start writing one. > I had planned to concentrate on the technical issues of setting up > anti-spam filtering both at the local level, the MUA level, as well as > site-wide installations, the MTA tier, both using a mix of current > best-of-breed open source technologies. > All this information is available in discrete, distributed sources; > however, I feel, that the time is right fot a LDP doc. this is a very good idea. spam has always be a problem but it becomes more and more annoying - I work with internet and don't bother faking my e-mail, so I receive approx a hundred spam a day (more than half my mails). I use mozilla and it's junk control but, for now, it needs still read the mail on my computer. thanks god I hav a dsl line, but even like this it make me loose too many time yhanks jdd -- <http://www.dodin.net> Formation Linux débutants open | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Progress on the Anti-Spam HOWTO
From: Hal Burgiss ####@####.#### Date: 31 May 2003 14:12:05 -0000 Message-Id: <20030531141204.GU5001@feenix.burgiss.net> On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 07:14:12AM +0200, jdd wrote: > > I use mozilla and it's junk control but, for now, it needs still > read the mail on my computer. thanks god I hav a dsl line, but even > like this it make me loose too many time I have an interest and would consider helping as well. I am doing postfix+procmail+bogofilter with the goal of getting at least one week in my life with no spam. Week to Date Spam Summary Sun May 25 04:10:00 thru Sat May 31 09:57:44 EDT 2003 Postfix Rejected: 803 Procmail Filtered: 35 Bogofied: 75 Spams missed: 33 Total Spams: 946 Spams Blocked: 913 Percent Blocked: 97% It would be much better than that, but I botched one of my scripts that dynamically writes to procmailrc and some stuff got through that shouldn't. That's a home DSL line that hosts a domain. My ISP blocks 200-300 a week for me as well. -- Hal Burgiss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Progress on the Anti-Spam HOWTO
From: chris albert ####@####.#### Date: 31 May 2003 14:46:41 -0000 Message-Id: <3ED8C048.7000909@mcgill.ca> Hal , >I have an interest and would consider helping as well. > What is the best way to do this? Should we get a cvs account right away at tldp? I was just going to use the one of the big howto templates http://tldp.org/authors/template-ld/big-howto-template-ld.html follow the authoring guide http://tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/index.html using style suggestions from the gnome guide http://developer.gnome.org/documents/style-guide/ . Locally I'll import and export the sgml files from LyX so I wont need to worry to much about sgml syntax. Since I am in Quebec, I will also be able to get the doc translated into French. Since I am on dozens of anti-spam mailing lists, I thought once the doc had some meat on it I would try and get some help on specific technologies, since there really is too much going on right now for one person to master. > I am doing >postfix+procmail+bogofilter with the goal of getting at least one week >in my life with no spam. > > It can be done! Certainly at the local level, but it is harder site wide because of false positives, and varying ham/spam profiles among a large user base. Have you thought of combining bogofilter with spamassassin? http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/bogofilter/bogofilter/doc/bogofilter-faq.html#spamassassin http://www.randomhacks.net/2002/09/23/ http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/03/06/index2a_page6.html?tw=backend Let me know how you want to proceed. Thanks, Chris | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Progress on the Anti-Spam HOWTO
From: Hal Burgiss ####@####.#### Date: 31 May 2003 15:23:03 -0000 Message-Id: <20030531152303.GV5001@feenix.burgiss.net> On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 10:46:32AM -0400, chris albert wrote: > What is the best way to do this? Should we get a cvs account right > away at tldp? CVS would be good for a group effort like this. AFAIK, what we need is a) a fixed doc title for cvs purposes and then b) each author needs an ldp/cvs account to access cvs (I have one now). So I think the first order of business: - Decide on Doc title - Decide doc format (sgml, xml, etc) - Decide doc scope (eg usenet spam, etc....) - See who has what areas of interest and divide responsibility among authors - Make sure we are listed as a "work in progress" with tldp (?). - Do an outline - Write ;-) > I was just going to use the one of the big howto templates > http://tldp.org/authors/template-ld/big-howto-template-ld.html > follow the authoring guide > http://tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/index.html > using style suggestions from the gnome guide > http://developer.gnome.org/documents/style-guide/ . Just a personal note ... but I have worked very little with xml, and would like to learn that, and maybe this is a good oppurtunity! > Locally I'll import and export the sgml files from LyX so I wont need to > worry to much about sgml syntax. > Since I am in Quebec, I will also be able to get the doc translated into > French. > Since I am on dozens of anti-spam mailing lists, I thought once the doc > had some meat on it I would try and get > some help on specific technologies, since there really is too much going > on right now for one person to master. Can you suggest a few lists that aren't real high volume? > >I am doing > >postfix+procmail+bogofilter with the goal of getting at least one week > >in my life with no spam. > > > > > It can be done! Certainly at the local level, but it is harder site > wide because of false positives, and varying ham/spam profiles among > a large user base. Yes, of course. The best spam blocking is always the narrowest scope. One of my best rules is if html, probably is spam. That wouldn't work for most, I would guess though. > Have you thought of combining bogofilter with spamassassin? No, not really, but I should look into it. Right now I am spam free for about 3 days though :))))))))))))))) > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/bogofilter/bogofilter/doc/bogofilter-faq.html#spamassassin > http://www.randomhacks.net/2002/09/23/ > http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/03/06/index2a_page6.html?tw=backend > > Let me know how you want to proceed. -- Hal Burgiss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Progress on the Anti-Spam HOWTO
From: Tabatha Marshall ####@####.#### Date: 31 May 2003 16:34:54 -0000 Message-Id: <1054399000.22281.17.camel@mysticchild> One minor point to add - usually on the "In Progress" list there is at least one contact shown - you'll have to decide who wants that responsibility! Tab On Sat, 2003-05-31 at 08:23, Hal Burgiss wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 10:46:32AM -0400, chris albert wrote: > > > What is the best way to do this? Should we get a cvs account right > > away at tldp? > > CVS would be good for a group effort like this. AFAIK, what we need is > a) a fixed doc title for cvs purposes and then b) each author needs an > ldp/cvs account to access cvs (I have one now). > > So I think the first order of business: > > - Decide on Doc title > - Decide doc format (sgml, xml, etc) > - Decide doc scope (eg usenet spam, etc....) > - See who has what areas of interest and divide responsibility among > authors > - Make sure we are listed as a "work in progress" with tldp (?). > - Do an outline > - Write ;-) > > > I was just going to use the one of the big howto templates > > http://tldp.org/authors/template-ld/big-howto-template-ld.html > > follow the authoring guide > > http://tldp.org/LDP/LDP-Author-Guide/index.html > > using style suggestions from the gnome guide > > http://developer.gnome.org/documents/style-guide/ . > > Just a personal note ... but I have worked very little with xml, and > would like to learn that, and maybe this is a good oppurtunity! > > > Locally I'll import and export the sgml files from LyX so I wont need to > > worry to much about sgml syntax. > > Since I am in Quebec, I will also be able to get the doc translated into > > French. > > Since I am on dozens of anti-spam mailing lists, I thought once the doc > > had some meat on it I would try and get > > some help on specific technologies, since there really is too much going > > on right now for one person to master. > > Can you suggest a few lists that aren't real high volume? > > > >I am doing > > >postfix+procmail+bogofilter with the goal of getting at least one week > > >in my life with no spam. > > > > > > > > It can be done! Certainly at the local level, but it is harder site > > wide because of false positives, and varying ham/spam profiles among > > a large user base. > > Yes, of course. The best spam blocking is always the narrowest scope. > One of my best rules is if html, probably is spam. That wouldn't work > for most, I would guess though. > > > Have you thought of combining bogofilter with spamassassin? > > No, not really, but I should look into it. Right now I am spam free > for about 3 days though :))))))))))))))) > > > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/*checkout*/bogofilter/bogofilter/doc/bogofilter-faq.html#spamassassin > > http://www.randomhacks.net/2002/09/23/ > > http://hotwired.lycos.com/webmonkey/03/06/index2a_page6.html?tw=backend > > > > Let me know how you want to proceed. -- Tabatha Marshall Web: www.merlinmonroe.com Linux Documentation Project Review Coordinator (http://www.tldp.org) Linux Counter Area Manager US:wa (http://counter.li.org) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Progress on the Anti-Spam HOWTO
From: chris albert ####@####.#### Date: 31 May 2003 18:30:13 -0000 Message-Id: <3ED8F4A9.6000701@mcgill.ca> Hal >CVS would be good for a group effort like this. AFAIK, what we need is >a) a fixed doc title for cvs purposes and then b) each author needs an >ldp/cvs account to access cvs (I have one now). > >So I think the first order of business: > > - Decide on Doc title > Why not the Anti-Spam HOWTO ? It would be the first thing I searched for, and has the advantage of being obvious. > - Decide doc format (sgml, xml, etc) > I am agnostic here, though as I mentioned earlier, I'm using LyX which has built in support for linuxdoc sgml. I spent many years writing TeX documents on emacs, and I'm thinking those days are over. It seems I can import and export docbook xml 4.2 with a db2lyx add on, and so I'm open to xml. It really depends on a group consensus, since I'm sure several people will get involved. > - Decide doc scope (eg usenet spam, etc....) > I was thinking of looking at spam fighting from 3 perspectives: MUA, MTA, Network Protocols . Obviously there is a 'higher' level of Legal Issues; though that is beyond my capabilities, and as long as there are open smtp relays in countries not subject to the laws in question, I think practical spam fighting will need to be done at the three 'technological' tiers mentioned above. Usenet spam is an interesting and problematic case. First of all, almost all the research and spam filtering techniques have concentrated on email. The usenet users population, of which I am one, is trivial compared to email users. Getting spam filtering right at the newsreader level could be a daunting task since some people subscribe to newsgroups like free.porno.flicks.erik-mouse.duct-tape.k-y-jelly , who might also be subscribed to , say comp.unix.admin. How to get the filtering right? Since I never have administered a nntp server, I'm not sure how some standard methods, like using DNSBL or RBLs might work. IMHO flaming maniacs are more of a threat to unmoderated newsgroups than spam, but if someone had things to about the usenet spam problem, they would be welcome. > - See who has what areas of interest and divide responsibility among > authors > - Make sure we are listed as a "work in progress" with tldp (?). > - Do an outline > This latter step seems important, since structural changes in the doc are likely to cause the most headaches with cvs commits. What is the best way to discuss the outline? In private emails, on this list? I manage the group that runs the list server at McGill university, and I could get created a mailing list for the contributors, if that would be useful. Eventually, I could find web space for the project once it was up and running. Chris P.S I'll put newsgroups/lists/bookmark sections in the first draft. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Progress on the Anti-Spam HOWTO
From: Hal Burgiss ####@####.#### Date: 1 Jun 2003 03:13:38 -0000 Message-Id: <20030601031338.GZ5001@feenix.burgiss.net> On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 02:30:01PM -0400, chris albert wrote: > > > >- Decide on Doc title > > > Why not the Anti-Spam HOWTO ? OK. Looking at cvs, this would mean an entry like: Anti-Spam-HOWTO and doc sources as Anti-Spam-HOWTO.sgml. I tried to create it this way in cvs but failed. I guess I lack permissions to create new entries. > >- Decide doc format (sgml, xml, etc) > > > I am agnostic here, though as I mentioned earlier, I'm using LyX which > has built in support for linuxdoc sgml. > I spent many years writing TeX documents on emacs, and I'm thinking > those days are over. It seems I can import > and export docbook xml 4.2 with a db2lyx add on, and so I'm open to xml. > It really depends on a group consensus, > since I'm sure several people will get involved. I really don't want to do linuxdoc sgml. Docbook/sgml is fine or xml is fine with me. > Usenet spam is an interesting and problematic case. First of all, almost I agree, and only mentioned this to make sure we define our mission. Email spam only then? > What is the best way to discuss the outline? > In private emails, on this list? > I manage the group that runs the list server at McGill university, and I > could get created a mailing list for the contributors, if that would be > useful. I think at some point, a separate list is indeed a good idea (if not too much trouble). -- Hal Burgiss | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Progress on the Anti-Spam HOWTO
From: Greg Ferguson ####@####.#### Date: 1 Jun 2003 15:03:50 -0000 Message-Id: <200306011501.h51F1kBc014856@hoop.timonium.sgi.com> On Sat, 31 May 2003 23:13:38 -0400 Hal Burgiss ####@####.#### wrote: > On Sat, May 31, 2003 at 02:30:01PM -0400, chris albert wrote: > > > > > >- Decide on Doc title > > > > > Why not the Anti-Spam HOWTO ? > > OK. Looking at cvs, this would mean an entry like: > > Anti-Spam-HOWTO > > and doc sources as Anti-Spam-HOWTO.sgml. I tried to create it this way > in cvs but failed. I guess I lack permissions to create new entries. I created a directory for you and stuck a README file in there. <cvs_root>LDP/howto/docbook/Anti-Spam-HOWTO I also added the entry to our in progress list. I noted Hal as the point of contact, although I can add more names or change what's there. I've been following your discussion with interest as this concept of 'collaborative authoring' using CVS is exactly what I had hoped for (a direction the LDP should move in). Keep up the good work and best of luck in developing this very important HOWTO. When you have a draft prepared, simply let me/us know. -- Greg | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Subject:
Re: Progress on the Anti-Spam HOWTO
From: chris albert ####@####.#### Date: 1 Jun 2003 16:36:04 -0000 Message-Id: <3EDA2B5A.4040001@mcgill.ca> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hal |I really don't want to do linuxdoc sgml. Docbook/sgml is fine or xml |is fine with me. If you dont mind, I'd like to go with dockbook sgml . Apparently it is not hard to convert that to xml if we want to at some point. Should I use the big-howto-template, or do you have other design preferences? |I agree, and only mentioned this to make sure we define our mission. |Email spam only then? That's big enough, and what bugs millions of people right now. | |I think at some point, a separate list is indeed a good idea (if not |too much trouble). I can create a list tomorrow for you and I. I will make us both owners. What email address to you want me to use? I made a request for a cvs account, which had a strange slavic twist : |Contents / Tre[: | |>> |>> CVS Account request for: |>> ####@####.#### |>> |>> The reason is: |>> Creation of the Anti-Spam-howto Although now that Greg Ferguson has set you up, I guess I'll just need rights to that node. Chris -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQE+2itRkRKXIlZkCr8RAmS9AJ9Xd3QARSdA2BjIowvrvtYAxpwKVgCaA5iw K7MB/X1OQhvNw0BOg58ds+M= =teT7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[<<] [<] Page 1 of 3 [>] [>>] |