discuss: part of the review?


Previous by date: 15 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0000 Re: Archived Documents, David Lawyer
Next by date: 15 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0000 Re: Free Documentation Definition (revised), David Merrill
Previous in thread: 15 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0000 Re: part of the review?, Randy Kramer
Next in thread: 15 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0000 Re: part of the review?, John Peter Tapsell

Subject: Re: part of the review?
From: David Merrill ####@####.####
Date: 15 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0000
Message-Id: <20010715183212.C22643@lupercalia.net>

On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 03:46:59PM -0400, Randy Kramer wrote:
> David Merrill wrote:
> > I doubt any word processor will ever produce really good DocBook. A
> > good XML editor, on the other hand, will probably be better. Several
> > of those are coming along nicely now. Within 6 months we should have
> > at least two ready for real use.
> 
> Which are those two?  Open source?

Search the archives, there were some discussions earlier this month or
last month. Sorry, but I don't remember atm. And yes, they were GPL
iirc.

-- 
Dr. David C. Merrill                     http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project                   ####@####.####
Collection Editor & Coordinator            http://www.linuxdoc.org

To the cross roads I must go
To find a world unseen
Fear and wonder will I know,
And be a bridge between
		-- To the Crossroads, Starhawk

Previous by date: 15 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0000 Re: Archived Documents, David Lawyer
Next by date: 15 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0000 Re: Free Documentation Definition (revised), David Merrill
Previous in thread: 15 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0000 Re: part of the review?, Randy Kramer
Next in thread: 15 Jul 2001 22:32:37 -0000 Re: part of the review?, John Peter Tapsell


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.