discuss: Archived Documents


Previous by date: 15 Jul 2001 22:21:53 -0000 Re: Free Documentation Definition (revised), David Lawyer
Next by date: 15 Jul 2001 22:21:53 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Merrill
Previous in thread: 15 Jul 2001 22:21:53 -0000 Re: Archived Documents, Randy Kramer
Next in thread: 15 Jul 2001 22:21:53 -0000 Re: Archived Documents, David Merrill

Subject: Re: Archived Documents
From: David Lawyer ####@####.####
Date: 15 Jul 2001 22:21:53 -0000
Message-Id: <20010715135122.A158@lafn.org>

On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 12:42:30AM -0400, David Merrill wrote:
> We have long kept a list of `unmaintained' documents. However, we
> don't have a real `archive' separate from that. This needs to change.
> More on that later, though...

Another category is documents seeking a maintainer.  This is where
the current maintainer doesn't want to do it anymore but is willing to
keep maintaining it until someone else comes along.  This could be
called the "maintainer wanted" category.

One way to do this in on a trial basis.  The old maintainer may want
to be able to reclaim the doc if s/he thinks that the new maintainer
is not doing a satisfactory job.  It would be up to the old maintainer
as to whether or not s/he wants to go this route.

What about calling the archive "obsolete" to show that the docs in
them don't really need a new maintainer (unless someone really wants
to do it).

			David Lawyer

Previous by date: 15 Jul 2001 22:21:53 -0000 Re: Free Documentation Definition (revised), David Lawyer
Next by date: 15 Jul 2001 22:21:53 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Merrill
Previous in thread: 15 Jul 2001 22:21:53 -0000 Re: Archived Documents, Randy Kramer
Next in thread: 15 Jul 2001 22:21:53 -0000 Re: Archived Documents, David Merrill


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.