discuss: part of the review?


Previous by date: 15 Jul 2001 19:56:17 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Merrill
Next by date: 15 Jul 2001 19:56:17 -0000 Re: Free Documentation Definition (revised), David Lawyer
Previous in thread: 15 Jul 2001 19:56:17 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Merrill
Next in thread: 15 Jul 2001 19:56:17 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Merrill

Subject: Re: part of the review?
From: Randy Kramer ####@####.####
Date: 15 Jul 2001 19:56:17 -0000
Message-Id: <3B51F349.7416@fast.net>

David Merrill wrote:
> I would imagine there would be difficulty dealing with the highly
> nested nature of DocBook. The set of `styles' (tags) available change
> based on the tag you're currently within.

Yeah, that's probably fairly tough to deal with.

> 
> I doubt any word processor will ever produce really good DocBook. A
> good XML editor, on the other hand, will probably be better. Several
> of those are coming along nicely now. Within 6 months we should have
> at least two ready for real use.

Which are those two?  Open source?

Thanks,
Randy Kramer

Previous by date: 15 Jul 2001 19:56:17 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Merrill
Next by date: 15 Jul 2001 19:56:17 -0000 Re: Free Documentation Definition (revised), David Lawyer
Previous in thread: 15 Jul 2001 19:56:17 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Merrill
Next in thread: 15 Jul 2001 19:56:17 -0000 Re: part of the review?, David Merrill


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.