discuss: DocBook is a catastrophe
Subject:
Re: [discuss] DocBook is a catastrophe
From:
Machtelt Garrels ####@####.####
Date:
14 Dec 2005 15:21:05 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0512141518250.8231-100000@cobra.xalasys.com>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, Yaroslav Fedevych wrote:
> Sorry but it is if you want to add a chapter or two, or just reorganize
> the whole thing. For me, DocBook is much like a binary-only format -- I might
> as well use compressed PostScript, PDF or DVI with some strange font encoding.
>
> It does not matter for new documents, but for existing ones, it does.
Well, would it help if we put up a note somewhere plainly visible that
says something like:
"If you need help reorganizing an existing DocBook document or adding
content to an existing DocBook document, please contact
docbook_at_nospam_en_tldp_org" ?
Tille.
- --
Machtelt Garrels ####@####.####
Review Coordinator http://www.tldp.org/authors/
My Penguin, my freedom. http://tille.xalasys.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFDoDhdsIIUbMXbBA8RAhmMAKC9IcHSdYoemAf4bCy0TP5xwx3aQACfYWdU
A2N9jmzt1I9XfTX3k0Pgiyc=
=FBrj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
