discuss: LDP or TLDP ?


Previous by date: 11 Oct 2005 17:34:12 -0000 Re: LDP or TLDP ?, Rick Moen
Next by date: 11 Oct 2005 17:34:12 -0000 Re: Translation effort workflow, Alex Nordstrom
Previous in thread: 11 Oct 2005 17:34:12 -0000 Re: LDP or TLDP ?, Rick Moen
Next in thread: 11 Oct 2005 17:34:12 -0000 Re: LDP or TLDP ?, David Lawyer

Subject: Re: [discuss] LDP or TLDP ?
From: Rick Moen ####@####.####
Date: 11 Oct 2005 17:34:12 -0000
Message-Id: <20051011173409.GS8455@linuxmafia.com>

Quoting Alex Nordstrom ####@####.####

> (On a related note, I suppose that makes part of my signature a 
> tautology. So be it.)

Patch it.  ;->  You are "subscribed to the LDP discuss[ion] list".

-- 
Cheers,               Chip Salzenberg: "Usenet is not a right."
Rick Moen            Edward Vielmetti: "Usenet is a right, a left, a jab,
####@####.####                     and a sharp uppercut to the jaw.
                                        The postman hits!  You have new mail."

Previous by date: 11 Oct 2005 17:34:12 -0000 Re: LDP or TLDP ?, Rick Moen
Next by date: 11 Oct 2005 17:34:12 -0000 Re: Translation effort workflow, Alex Nordstrom
Previous in thread: 11 Oct 2005 17:34:12 -0000 Re: LDP or TLDP ?, Rick Moen
Next in thread: 11 Oct 2005 17:34:12 -0000 Re: LDP or TLDP ?, David Lawyer


  ©The Linux Documentation Project, 2014. Listserver maintained by dr Serge Victor on ibiblio.org servers. See current spam statz.