discuss: part of the review?
Subject:
Re: part of the review?
From:
Poet/Joshua Drake ####@####.####
Date:
15 Jul 2001 06:32:47 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107142330080.7460-100000@commandprompt.com>
Naaa. we haven't flame wars in a long time, you yellow bellied, half
brother of your wifes, sisters cousin's uncle.... ;)
Actually the LDP is really good about not flaming each other. We pretty
much dropped all that crap about 2.5 years ago.
J
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001, David Merrill wrote:
>On Sun, Jul 15, 2001 at 12:19:19PM +0930, David Lloyd wrote:
>>
>> Let's just drop the LinuxDoc vs DocBook word war and see which one ends
>> up being most supported. Too much time wasted already on it...
>>
>> DSL
>>
>> (and yes, that last sentence was supposed to sound like Yoda)
>
>This isn't a flamewar! This is a difference of opinion, but we've
>never degenerated into namecalling or insulting each other. It's
>important we have this discussion so all other other people get to
>hear the viewpoints and make up their own minds.
>
>But we definitely don't need to go on and on about it once we've made
>aur points, which I think we have at this point.
>
>Now I'm going back to work. :-)
>
>
--
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--
