discuss: Proposal
Subject:
Re: Proposal
From:
Trevor Woerner ####@####.####
Date:
22 Apr 2005 11:53:07 -0000
Message-Id: <200504220752.41071.tldp092@vtnet.ca>
Hi Rahul,
Sorry, my last email was a bit too generic :-)
On Friday 22 April 2005 01:56, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Kernel 2.4.22
> binutils 1.4
> GCC ?
In the course of editing the document, I might just as well update it at
the same time. I'll give it a spin with the latest kernels (2.4.x and
2.6.y) as well as binutils-2.15... maybe even try gcc-4.0.0 now that
it's out.
> The above section differentiates between various formats including
> EXE and COM ones. Is this really relevant to the document.
Probably not. I just wanted something to say "ELF isn't the only way to
do things"; make the reader aware that ELF is a decision, not taken for
granted.
> Your copyright section
I am *so* not a lawyer... :-)
How I feel about the various licenses flip-flops on a weekly basis.
> You will probably need to run this through a kernel expert to get a
> technical review external to LDP. Can you do this on this own?
I'll ask on #kernelnewbies to see if someone might be interested. If all
else fails I could try lkml itself.
> The Docbook/ Linuxdoc source format might be useful to those who
> want to check the markup. Please provide both the html and
> Docbook/Linuxdoc version of this document for every revision that you
> present to this list.
No problem. I'll add that the next time I do an update.
Best regards,
Trevor
