discuss: (Fwd) possible new 'guide'
Subject:
Re: (Fwd) possible new 'guide'
From:
Poet/Joshua Drake ####@####.####
Date:
12 Jul 2001 15:56:17 -0000
Message-Id: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0107120854160.17270-100000@commandprompt.com>
Sounds good to me.
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001, Greg Ferguson wrote:
>fwd'ing to duscussion list...
>
>
>--- Forwarded mail from ####@####.####
>
>Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2001 10:45:41 -0400
>From: ####@####.####
>To: ####@####.####
>Subject: possible new 'guide'
>
>To: LDP
>From: Richard Sevenich
>Re: Possible new guide for LDP
>
>For the last several years I have developed/maintained a training course,
>"An
>Introduction to Linux Device Driver Modules", now consistent with the 2.4
>kernel. It is basically an intensive hands-on introduction to the subject
>matter, rather than a definitive reference like the Rubini/Corbet book.
>nevertheless it gives a fair amount of background material and stands on
>its
>own.
>
>I could devote the summer of 2002 (a year from now) to converting this to
>an LDP
>guide - and appropriately updating it.
>
>Would you consider this to (potentially) be a worthwhile addition to your
>library of materials?
>
>Best regards,
>Richard Sevenich
>
>__________________________________________________________________
>Get your own FREE, personal Netscape Webmail account today at
>http://webmail.netscape.com/
>
>___________________________________
>thanks for submitting into linuxdoc
>
>
>---End of forwarded mail from ####@####.####
>
>_________________________
>http://list.linuxdoc.org/
>
--
--
<COMPANY>CommandPrompt - http://www.commandprompt.com </COMPANY>
<PROJECT>OpenDocs, LLC. - http://www.opendocs.org </PROJECT>
<PROJECT>LinuxPorts - http://www.linuxports.com </PROJECT>
<WEBMASTER>LDP - http://www.linuxdoc.org </WEBMASTER>
--
Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology,"
start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.
--
