discuss: LDP "non-free" documents
Subject:
Re: LDP "non-free" documents
From:
doug jensen ####@####.####
Date:
10 Mar 2005 20:31:20 -0000
Message-Id: <20050310203042.GA25503@debian>
On Thu, Mar 10, 2005 at 02:31:01PM -0500, Emma Jane Hogbin wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am the current maintainer for the LDP Author Guide. I'm working on the
> section on licensing right now. It has been brought to my attention that
> the LDP documents have been divided into "free" and "non-free" packages. I
> would like to give our authors a succinct explanation on the distinction so
> that they may choose the best license for their document.
I agree with your solution. I had hoped to avoid bothering them.
But, I would have done the same thing if you would have confirmed
what you said about relying on Rick Moen's Debian policy statement.
--
Doug Jensen
