discuss: LDP "non-free" documents
Subject:
Re: LDP "non-free" documents
From:
Rick Moen ####@####.####
Date:
10 Mar 2005 20:01:36 -0000
Message-Id: <20050310200134.GQ27314@linuxmafia.com>
Quoting Andrew M.A. Cater ####@####.####
> Emma,
>
> As a Debian developer, I was about to draft a long response to Rick
> Moen.
Which I will await with respect and interest, and will receive with
gratitude for your time and effort. (I'm actually on both the mailing
lists you've CC'd, here.)
I hope it will be couched in terms of the actual governing structure of
the Debian Project, i.e., will reflect what are actual in-force,
official positions of the Debian Project, as opposted to references to
some individuals' views in their individual capacities _or_ any "consensus"
of their views (your term), irrespective of how respected they might be.
Otherwise, the question at hand would not have been addressed.
Thanks, Andy.
