discuss: Staff Election was Re: LDP Committee?
Subject:
Re: Staff Election was Re: LDP Committee?
From:
"G Ferguson / LDP" ####@####.####
Date:
8 Mar 2005 01:29:16 -0000
Message-Id: <20050308012923.A03F6415C5@mail01.powweb.com>
> That's absolutely fine by me. I rather hoped some of the staff members
> would come back with a account of their own story. As long as it's
> done in the open, and publicly documented for all to see (and query if
> they wish), then I'm happy with it. It's the 'hole in corner' attitude
> that riles me. Could you make sure it gets put on the website?
Martin,
That was never the intent. The "staff" is clearly listed here,
along with a description of their current duties:
http://www.tldp.org/vlist.html
Do we need more than that? Do I really need to outline my
6+(?!?!) year involvement with the project?
The original intent on the formation of the staff mailing
list (as I recall) was to simply pull out the mundane
LDP "chores" from the discussion list. Such as:
"serek, can you <do something> to the cvs tree"
"greg, can you add/remove this/that from a certain web page"
etc.
Any policy decisions may have been discussed,
but only for the intent of preparing a statement or
proposal to the larger "discuss" list.
If you want the staff mailing list removed, then it should
be removed. I don't think this is a big deal. I'm all for
getting rid of it, if it's causing ill feelings.
>> Probably a popularity contest with the person
>> with the most votes winning is fine?
>
> Suits me.
Isn't this a waste of time/effort? Or is there some
other hidden agenda I'm missing here? Are you
not happy with certain individuals? Please come
out and just say it.
Bottom-line: If there are people that want certain
roles or want to assist in particular tasks, by all
means step forward! There is enough to
do to keep everyone busy!
regards
--
Greg Ferguson / LDP volunteer
####@####.####
