discuss: part of the review?
Subject:
Re: part of the review?
From:
David Merrill ####@####.####
Date:
9 Jul 2001 21:13:06 -0000
Message-Id: <20010709171250.D4456@lupercalia.net>
On Mon, Jul 09, 2001 at 01:11:03PM -0400, Dan York wrote:
> > The *tools* are the bitch, and the docbook processor removes that
> > problem. Very few people are using it, which means either people
> > aren't having as much trouble as we thought with their tools, or it
> > isn't publicized enough.
>
> I think the latter. How is it being publicized?
It's mentioned in the LAG. I've mentioned it in the LDPWN. That's it
afaik.
> > I'd like to point out that our docbook % has gone from:
> <snip>
> > I keep these statistics, and all other stats, on a weekly basis.
>
> Cool stats! Are they anywhere online? (like a page on the LDP site?)
I do a `lynx --dump' of http://www.lupercalia.net/cgi-bin/ldp_stats.pl
as a weekly cron job.
I've been thinking about putting some of these basic stats into a
table in the database so I can generate graphs of them. But I'm not
sure how I want to do it, which is why it's vaporware.
None of this database stuff runs on `official' LDP servers. They all
run on my workstation at home. I just got a great AlphaServer
(woohoo!) and I plan to move these services onto it sometime Real Soon
Now.
--
Dr. David C. Merrill http://www.lupercalia.net
Linux Documentation Project ####@####.####
Collection Editor & Coordinator http://www.linuxdoc.org
Let the machine do the dirty work.
-- "Elements of Programming Style", Kernighan and Ritchie
