discuss: where is ipnatctl??
Subject:
Re: where is ipnatctl??
From:
"Greg Ferguson" ####@####.####
Date:
9 Jul 2001 14:14:42 -0000
Message-Id: <10107091006.ZM5800@hoop.timonium.sgi.com>
On Jul 9, 9:44am, Hal Burgiss wrote:
> Subject: Re: where is ipnatctl??
> On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 08:08:06PM -0400, David Merrill wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 07, 2001 at 04:30:23PM -0700, Poet/Joshua Drake wrote:
> > > I would suspect that it was quiet DROP ;)
> >
> > Well, let's just keep trying. Sooner or later, he'll probably answer.
>
> Bingo!
>
> > From: Rusty Russell ####@####.####
> > Date: Sun, 08 Jul 2001 17:48:08 +1000
> > Subject: Re: The LDP guys no longer return my EMails
> > To: Hal Burgiss ####@####.####
> > Delivered-To: ####@####.####
> > In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 07 Jul 2001 15:48:09 -0400."
> > ####@####.####
> > Sender: ####@####.####
> > In message ####@####.#### you write:
> > > > The LDP guys no longer return my EMails (from me or my hamster).
> > >
> > > Rusty,
> >
> > Dear Hal,
> >
> > Please judge for yourself from the original:
> > http://netfilter.filewatcher.org/unreliable-guides
> >
> > I'd be happy for you to take the latest CVS version of the
> > guides (or I can do a release if you want) and feed it to LDP...
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Rusty.
>
> Well? There are four related HOWTOs and a FAQ.
I didn't see the FAQ, I see 4 HOWTOs and 2 Guides (html versions
of the guides bring up 404's).
Anyway, he should send the HOWTOs to ####@####.####
as they appear to be in good shape (linuxdoc SGML). Although
I did not review the depth/nature of the content.
As I look over the docs, I now recall...we had some requests for
the NAT HOWTO which prompted my emailing Rusty.
r,
Ferg
