discuss: LDP Committee?
Subject:
Re: LDP Committee?
From:
Guylhem Aznar ####@####.####
Date:
3 Mar 2005 20:23:03 -0000
Message-Id: <20050303202303.GB12799@externe.net>
On Thursday, 3 March 2005 at 23:56:41 (+1100), Binh Nguyen wrote:
> > AFAIK there is a TLDP staff, and there are funds as well. Guylhem
> > Aznar knows about those things.
>
> Can't believe I didn't see that stuff, must be going blind....
Since I'm brought in the conversation - we have a loose organisation.
It has good points (flexibility) and bad points (lack of visibility),
yet it seems the best solution for the size of the current project.
Maybe we should try to work differently? I mean, we now have a
profusion of documentation. Stale documentation, and deciding on which
document one should read are the biggest problem.
I don't have solutions - just some ideas, which however may be hard to
implement (ex: create a new structure for a better integration of
documents, along with an easy way to share competance in a
peer-moderated wiki) since we all have ideas.
Maybe we should try to build something new?
--
Bien à vous - Best regards,
Guylhem P. Aznar
--
####@####.#### http://externe.net
Périmé/Deprecated: @oeil.qc.ca, @metalab.unc.edu, @ibiblio.org, @7un.org
GPG: 92EB37C1 DD11C9C9 20519D01 E8FA1B11 42975AF7 http://externe.net/pubkey
